Patriot Scientific der Highflyer 2006
kurs interresiert es allerdings noch nicht....
__________________________________________________
Wenn man seinem Hund beibringt über einen See zu springen, wird es Menschen geben die behaubten er ist nur Wasserscheu.
Dafür kann es eigengentlich nur einen Grund geben: Außergerichtliche Einigung.
Den Satz hatte ich so verstanden: "The attached "attachment #(1) Text of Proposed Order" asking the judge to dismiss the lawsuit as both sides have come to an agreement as signed by both parties."
Kann ich mich also noch mal schlafen legen....
>The attached "attachment #(1) Text of Proposed Order" asking the judge to dismiss the lawsuit as both sides have come to an agreement as signed by both parties.
I hope your right, the exhibit could by some other form of documnet that the Js feel could help them extend the stay.
>This would have to come from the defendants as they are asking the Judge of their own free will and TT&C are nodding over their shoulder saying "yes Sir we do agree with this motion.
IMO this would of had to be a "Joint Mostion" for that to have happened. IMO, the negotiations fell through, and the Js without giving notice to TPL went and filed a motion to stay maybe hoping for a good outcome of the USPTO.
To me the Js are taunting TPL, not caring that they may have to pay treble damages.
TPL and their attornies are no dummies, they came up with a reasonable settlement numbers of 10 years of products that the J's manufactured, calculated thier percentage of loss, (It could be a billion dollars per defendant) and tried to negotiate from that.
The J's wanting to get off cheap ultimately made a decision not to negotiate.
When you consider that the Js sold billions of dollars of products over the last 10 years (each), lets just say that maybe a low figure of $5 Billion dollars, X 3 = $15 Billion Dollars (each defendant has at least 5 subsidiaries) X 5 subs., = $75 Billion dollars!
Being conservative, lets just make believe that TPL says our MMP is worth $2% of the 75 Bil., that would = $1,500,000,000 target as a reasonable settlement.
What if TPL asked for half of that, and the Js still got cheap?
The Js could not of had sold all those products without the MMP, and they though they could steal the patents and get off cheap, but there is such a thing called justice, and justice will prevail!
J's do you hear that? !!!
Die USPTO-Entscheidung abzuwarten, das hätte für die J's dann auch vor dem 30-Tage stay feststehen müssen, macht wenig Sinn. Würde dem Richter auch nicht gefallen, denke ich.
Allerdings habe ich nur heute morgen kurz alles auf Agora kurz nachgelesen, da war auch nur der neue "sealed" Pacer bekannt, was genau beantragt wird, weiss ja niemand.
Jedenfalls sieht es nach einer weiteren Vertagung aus....
Optionen
| Boardmail an "Matzelbub" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
Auf bald,
Abenteurer
Patented Technology Covers Maker of Gaming Equipment
CARLSBAD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Patriot Scientific Corporation (OTCBB:PTSC) announced today that WMS Gaming Inc. has purchased a Moore Microprocessor Patent™ (MMP) Portfolio license from The TPL Group, Patriot’s exclusive licensing partner. WMS utilizes industry-leading technologies to create innovative products and revolutionary new gaming experiences.
“We welcome WMS as our 27th licensee and the first in the gaming industry,” said Jim Turley, Patriot’s president and CEO. “The recent increase in licensing activity and this summer’s favorable court ruling on our patents are both strong signals that companies should think ahead and move quickly.”
The sweeping scope of electronics applications that use MMP design techniques continues to encourage manufacturers of end-user products from around the world to license the MMP technology. More than 25 global companies have purchased licenses including Intel, AMD, Hewlett Packard, Casio, Fujitsu, Sony, Nikon, Seiko Epson, Pentax, Olympus, Kenwood, Agilent, Lexmark, Schneider Electric, NEC Corporation, Funai Electric, SanDisk, Sharp Corporation, Nokia, Bull, LEGO, Denso Wave, Philips, TEAC and Daewoo.
About WMS
WMS is engaged in serving the gaming industry worldwide by designing, manufacturing, and marketing video and reel-spinning gaming machines and video lottery terminals. WMS also places gaming machines in legal gaming venues. WMS is headquartered in Waukegan, Illinois.
About Patriot Scientific
Patriot Scientific is a leading intellectual-property licensing company that develops, markets, and enables innovative technologies that satisfy the demands of fast-growing markets for wireless devices, smart cards, home appliances, network gateways, set-top boxes, entertainment technology, automotive telematics, biomedical devices, industrial controllers and more. Headquartered in Carlsbad, Calif., information about the company can be found at http://www.ptsc.com.
An investment profile on Patriot Scientific may be found at http://www.hawkassociates.com/ptscprofile.aspx. Copies of Patriot Scientific press releases, current price quotes, stock charts and other valuable information for investors may be found at http://www.hawkassociates.com and http://www.americanmicrocaps.com. To receive free e-mail notification of future releases for Patriot Scientific, sign up at http://www.hawkassociates.com/email.aspx.
About the MMP Portfolio
The Moore Microprocessor Patent Portfolio contains intellectual property that is jointly owned by the privately held TPL Group and publicly held Patriot Scientific Corporation (OTCBB:PTSC). The portfolio includes seven U.S. patents as well as their European and Japanese counterparts. The jointly owned patents protect fundamental technology used in the design of microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors (DSPs), embedded microprocessors, and system-on-chip (SoC) devices. Manufacturers of microprocessor-based products can learn more about how to participate in the MMP Portfolio Licensing Program by contacting: mmp-licensing@alliacense.com.
About Alliacense
Alliacense is a TPL Group Enterprise executing best-in-class design and implementation of Intellectual Property (IP) licensing programs. As a cadre of IP licensing strategists, technology experts, and experienced business development/management executives, Alliacense focuses on expanding the awareness and value of TPL’s IP portfolios. Founded in 1988, The TPL Group has emerged as a coalition of high technology enterprises involved in the development, management and commercialization of proprietary product technologies as well as the design, manufacture and sales of proprietary products based on those technologies and corresponding IP assets. For more information, visit http://www.alliacense.com.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this news release looking forward in time involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks associated with the effect of changing economic conditions, trends in the products markets, variations in the company's cash flow, market acceptance risks, patent litigation, technical development risks, seasonality and other risk factors detailed in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
Moore Microprocessor Patent (MMP) and Alliacense are trademarks of Technology Properties Limited (TPL). PTSC is a trademark of Patriot Scientific Corporation. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Der Link: http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/...iewID=news_view_popup
Wo sind die PTSC-Burschen, hier ist ja tote Hose, noch nicht Mal ein einziger Kommentar.
Halleluja sog i, hehehe.
Optionen
| Boardmail an "Matzelbub" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
Angehängte Grafik:
alois_zornig.jpg
alois_zornig.jpg
Ist schon erstaunlich wie viele Unternehmen unsere angeblich wertlosen oder ungültigen Patente lizensieren.
Der nächste Shareholderletter steht aus. Bin gespannt was unser CEO zu erzählen weiß.
Und Texas läßt uns auch etwas warten. Bis jetzt ist leider nicht bekannt was in dem ominösen Pacer stand.
Aber Geduld haben wir die letzten Jahre mit dieser Aktie lernen müssen. Jetzt kommt es auf wenige Tage oder Wochen auch nicht mehr an.
Aber das die USPTO unsere Patente für ungültig erklärt, daran kann ich nicht glauben und das die J3 in Texas gewinnen auch nicht.
Was soll uns also passieren ?
Gruß
Nassie
Lite-On Purchases Microprocessor Patent Portfolio License
Third Licensee in a Week Underscores Momentum of Licensing Effort
CARLSBAD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Patriot Scientific Corporation (OTCBB:PTSC) announced today that Lite-On IT Corporation has purchased a license to the company’s microprocessor-related patent portfolio. Lite-On IT thus becomes the company’s 28th licensee and the third within a week.
“Lite-On is the first major Taiwanese system company to purchase a license,” said Patriot Scientific president and CEO Jim Turley. “Following just days after Daewoo of Korea and another U.S. manufacturer announced yesterday, Lite-On becomes our third licensee this week, highlighting the tremendous momentum behind our microprocessor chip technology. My congratulations go out to Lite-On for their vision, and to Alliacense, our commercialization partner, for their excellent work.”
The sweeping scope of electronics applications that use MMP design techniques continues to encourage manufacturers of end-user products from around the world to license the MMP technology. More than 25 global companies have purchased licenses including AMD, Intel, Hewlett Packard, Casio, Fujitsu, Sony, Nikon, Seiko Epson, Pentax, Olympus, Kenwood, Agilent, Lexmark, Schneider Electric, NEC Corporation, Funai Electric, SanDisk, Sharp Corporation, Nokia, Bull, LEGO, DMP Electronics, Denso Wave, Philips, TEAC, Daewoo Electronics and Lite-On IT.
About Lite-On IT corporation
Lite-On IT corporation (Lite-On) is the largest CD-ROM manufacturer in Taiwan. Its R&D team develops sophisticated CD-ROM technology and has patent recognition for the first ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) used exclusively for CD-ROM. The outstanding functional features and stable quality of Lite-On IT products have been recognized by multiple European and American customers. Lite-On IT is the top CD-ROM brand name in the Chinese market. Through an alliance with Lite-On IT, Loyalty Founder Enterprise, a professional peripheral agent, is the agent for all Lite-On IT products including CD-ROM and CD-RW series.
About Patriot Scientific
Patriot Scientific is a leading intellectual-property licensing company that develops, markets, and enables innovative technologies that satisfy the demands of fast-growing markets for wireless devices, smart cards, home appliances, network gateways, set-top boxes, entertainment technology, automotive telematics, biomedical devices, industrial controllers and more. Headquartered in Carlsbad, Calif., information about the company can be found at http://www.ptsc.com.
An investment profile on Patriot Scientific may be found at http://www.hawkassociates.com/ptscprofile.aspx. Copies of Patriot Scientific press releases, current price quotes, stock charts and other valuable information for investors may be found at http://www.hawkassociates.com and http://www.americanmicrocaps.com. To receive free e-mail notification of future releases for Patriot Scientific, sign up at http://www.hawkassociates.com/email.aspx.
About the MMP Portfolio
The Moore Microprocessor PatentTM Portfolio contains intellectual property that is jointly owned by the privately held TPL Group and publicly held Patriot Scientific Corporation (OTCBB:PTSC). The portfolio includes seven U.S. patents as well as their European and Japanese counterparts. The jointly owned patents protect fundamental technology used in the design of microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors (DSPs), embedded microprocessors, and system-on-chip (SoC) devices. Manufacturers of microprocessor-based products can learn more about how to participate in the MMP Portfolio Licensing Program by contacting: mmp-licensing@alliacense.com.
About Alliacense
Alliacense is a TPL Group Enterprise executing best-in-class design and implementation of Intellectual Property (IP) licensing programs. As a cadre of IP licensing strategists, technology experts, and experienced business development/management executives, Alliacense focuses on expanding the awareness and value of TPL’s IP portfolios. Founded in 1988, The TPL Group has emerged as a coalition of high technology enterprises involved in the development, management and commercialization of proprietary product technologies as well as the design, manufacture and sales of proprietary products based on those technologies and corresponding IP assets. For more information, visit http://www.alliacense.com.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this news release looking forward in time involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks associated with the effect of changing economic conditions, trends in the products markets, variations in the company's cash flow, market acceptance risks, patent litigation, technical development risks, seasonality and other risk factors detailed in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
Moore Microprocessor Patent (MMP) and Alliacense are trademarks of Technology Properties Limited (TPL). PTSC is a trademark of Patriot Scientific Corporation. All other trademarks belong to their respective owners.
aus der Sicht eines Anwaltes, des im Agora-Board sehr geschätzten Ronran. Die meisten PTSC-Fans werden das wahrscheinlich schon gelesen haben:
Posted by: ronran on December 07, 2007 09:13AM
I have had a considerable number of inquiries about the sealed motion for additional stay, so I thought I would make a post on this subject. Sorry for the length, but I try to be inclusive since I don't post regularly. The bottom line is that I see no cause for undue concern at this time. With the reminder that anything can happen, I seriously doubt that any of the lawyers in this case would want to approach Judge Ward with event a hint of delaying this trial any further --- therefore, I conclude that the greatest likelihood is that settlement negotiations are continuing, and that the additional stay is for that purpose. It is always possible, of course, that negotations have completely unraveled and that the decision has been made to proceed to trial, but that would appear to be contrary to the request for an additional stay --- in other words, there would be no need to stay the case if the desire is to go to trial. Remember that negotations of this type do not only involve dollars, but also other conditions that affect the parties and perhaps even non-parties --- as a result, there may be some dissension even among the defendants themselves as to how things should be handled, and such things can produce additional complexity. I do not know for sure that this is what is occurring, so it is pointless to engage in useless speculation about specifics --- based on my own experience in multi-defendant cases, however, it would not surprise me at all. What follows is my best guess at a time frame for the settlement to be concluded, assuming that is indeed what is going on behind closed doors. Please remember that I am not a patent lawyer, and that I still consider the initial stay, having been filed so close to a trial date, to be very unusual --- however, with all of that in mind, this is what my "practicing litigation attorney's" sense is telling me, FWIW to you. If I was going to request an additional stay of the case for the purpose of discussing settlement, and I still had a month or so prior to a trial setting, I would ask for more time than I actually thought necessary to reach the goal, especially since I would probably feel very uncomfortable about going "back to the well" a third time --- under present cirucumstances, that would be 7 - 10 calendar days, and while I haven't seen a PACER to the effect that the Order was signed, it is difficult for me to believe that Judge Ward would not do so in the present scenario. Of course, if the Order wasn't signed, then that places even more pressure on the parties to reach a conclusion. Either way, I would expect an announcement of some type around the middle of next week. You may recall that my original prediction quite some time ago was that the case would indeed settle, and that such would occur just before Christmas --- we are now nearing that time frame, although the original stay, being unusual in and of itself, had made me think it might actually be earlier. On the other hand, I am always mindful that lawyers are by nature "deadline seekers", i.e., that the amount of work necessary to complete any given task tends to expand in order to fill the maximum time that has been allotted. I see we have another licensing announcement this morning, which perhaps provides some indirect support for what I have said. In any event, I hope the above is of some use to you. Best wishes to all. |
Optionen
| Boardmail an "Matzelbub" |
Wertpapier: Patriot Scientific |
Die sich erhöhende Schlagzahl bei den Lizenznehmern deutet auch auf einen Erfolg von PTSC
auf ganzer Linie. Wenn jetzt noch die Großen der Branche wie: IBM, TI, Dell, Apple und Samsung lizensieren ist der entgültige Durchbruch geschafft.
Wichtig ist auch, das es bei einer Einigung in Texas zu richtig hohen Lizenzgebühren kommt. Das würde die Kursfantasie beflügeln.
Auf eine spannende Woche
Nassie
Warte gespannt auf 15.30 h.