Wie wärs mal mit Kino?
Seite 40 von 43 Neuester Beitrag: 29.10.13 21:45 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 31.01.07 12:54 | von: Feedback | Anzahl Beiträge: | 2.066 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 29.10.13 21:45 | von: Trendscout | Leser gesamt: | 146.323 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 34 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 37 | 38 | 39 | | 41 | 42 | 43 > |
http://www.insidekino.de/News.htm
Ich tippe darauf, dass das 1.Halbjahr 2011 auf dem Niveau des Vorjahres liegen wird, aber das 2.Halbjahr dann wesentlich stärker wird.
http://www.kino-potsdam.de/...d-zur-loge-im-bolshoi-theater-659n.html
Interessant find ich allerdings die horrenden Preise. 25 € pro Karte find ich als Zuschauer relativ heftig. Für die Kinobetreiber aber vermutlich eine super Gewinnmarge.
Aber danke für die Info. Das es da ne offizielle Seite gibt, wusste ich nicht. Gib doch gleich mal den Link!
Cinemaxx hängt schon seit 3 Monaten seitwärts bzw. -10%, obwohl Gesamtmarkt +10% … und das trotz gutem Zahlenwerk:
EBITDA/Umsatz > Vorjahresniveau trotz Fussball WM; Cash Flow /Blilanz solide; glänzende Wachstumsaussichten 2011; neue Märkte erschlossen; niedrige Bewertung => im Prinzip der Traum aller Anleger -> also woher kommt nur geringe Akzeptanz bei den Anlegern?
Klar, ein paar haben schon mal Kasse gemacht (die schon im Sommer dabei waren), aber das sollte kein großer Effekt sein.
Habt Ihr irgendwelche Erklärungen?
Und zweitens hat es vermutlich eben mit der noch vorhandenen Aktionärsstruktur zu tun. Kloiber und Flebbe sind die entscheidenen Akteure für den Kurs. Da können wir kaufen wie wir wollen. Man kann nur hoffen, dass sich nächstes Jahr die vermutlich weiter verbesserten Zahlen dann auch auf den Kurs entsprechend auswirken. Flebbe muss ja irgendwann rau sein. Allzu lange kann das nicht mehr dauern. Ist aber nicht auszuschließen, dass wir noch viele Monate warten müssen, aber dann auf einen Schlag ne Verdopplung des Kurses in wenigen Tagen passiert. Dieses Szenario würde mich nicht wundern.
Für die Potsdam-Kenner vielleicht
"Döner, Falavel - Wir kommen von der Havel!
oder für die totalen Insider
"Wir kommen von der Nuthe, jetzt gibt´s was auf die Schnute!"
Deine Zitate haben schon einen sehr starken regionalen Bezug. Gerade das letzte Zitat versteh ich als OrtsFremder überhaupt nicht
Nov. 30 2010 - 4:16 pm | 165 views | 0 recommendations | 2 comments
The slew of ads before a movie starts can be one of the most annoying parts of going to the theater. But theater owners have no interest in getting rid of the preshow. That advertising revenue has become an important part of theater chains’ bottom line.
To maximize that advertising three movie chains, Regal, AMC and Cinemark formed National CineMedia, a joint venture where 50% of the company is publicly held and 50% is owned by the theaters. NCM brings in and distributes the advertising for preshows at the theaters. For the first nine months of 2010 NCM brought in $275 million worth of advertising. The owning theaters benefit from that revenue in the form of $.20 dividends per share each quarter. The company has a $1 billion market capitalization.
Kurt Hall, the former head of Regal Entertainment Group, now runs NCM. I talked to Hall about the cost of advertising at the theater versus TV, the future of theater preshows and why companies need to up their game when advertising in theaters.
FORBES: Can movie goers expect more ads in the future?
KURT HALL: Not more. There’s only a certain amount of time between shows and it’s being fully utilized right now. What you will see is a raising of the bar when it comes to preshows. You’re going to see the advertising getting better and more 3-D ads.
Is it more expensive for advertisers to use the cinema or TV?
We are priced at about two times television on a CPM [cost per thousand views] basis. But that makes sense because if you look at recall research we’re more effective than television. The price compared to effectiveness is quite attractive. Our CPMs are up mid-single digits this year.
Can advertisers use the same ad on TV and in the theater?
They can but we prefer they do something more interesting like release a 90-second version of a commercial in the cinema. We would also like to be the first place they show the ad and a lot of advertisers are doing that. There’s public relations value in that too if you’re launching a new product. For example last April Samsung released an ad for its 3-D televisions in cinemas in 3-D.
Are a lot of companies now trying to advertise at the movies?
For the past five or six years the creative has been a bit of a gating factor because clients were intimidated by the prospect of producing ads for the cinema. So a few years ago I started meeting with companies to help them transition to the theater environment. So we’ve been able to add clients who hadn’t advertised here before. There are about 100 to 150 brands that advertise in cinemas. In TV there are thousands of brands.
The advent of high-definition television has also helped. It has an aspect ratio consistent with cinema and it’s encouraging companies to make better looking ads.
What are some new uses you are finding for theaters?
It’s a small part of the business but we’re trying to identify new sources of content that will put more people in movie theaters and broaden the demographics. The Metropolitan Opera is a good example of how we are taking content that wasn’t traditionally distributed in movie theaters and expanding it to a wider audience. We are trying to evolve a theater into a multipurpose entertainment complex that can handle lots of different entertainment.
I don’t think that will ever be as important as feature films but there are a lot of times during the week when feature films don’t do a good job of putting people into movie theaters. If you have a special event with content that there is an audience for, those people will come out on a Tuesday night. If you just have a feature film audiences have no reason to come out on a Tuesday.
Studios are pushing to shorten the time between when a film hits theaters and when it’s available in the home. Is that something you’re worried about?
If not done properly it has the potential to hurt theaters but they’re not going to do anything that hurts the first window of release because it is so important as a marketing platform to launch films in the next windows. If you valued just the trailers studios get to run as part of the booking relationship, it’s worth $1.5 billion per year. So that is clearly something they do not want to damage.
I think there’s going to be a lot of experimentation as studios figure out how to migrate the DVD business to the next evolution, which I believe will be direct to home. I think, unfortunately, the consumer has decided he can rent for a lot less than buying.
http://www.rundschau-online.de/html/artikel/1288741459429.shtml
Wenn er seine Anteile losgeworden ist, hört auch der Verkaufsdruck auf. Bloß wieviel Pulver hat er noch?
Warum sollte Kloiber mit seinem Investment seit 04 im Minus sein? Er ist dicke im Plus, denn die Aktien hat er ja über eine Kapitalerhöhung bekommen im Rahmen eines Schuldenerlasses...