Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEH)

das ist der third omnibus

lg
alexfra die 1.

 

http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/docket/...aspx?rc=1&WebAlias=LBH


exhibit 1
CLAIMS TO BE DISALLOWED

TOTAL $30,048,967.57

exhibit 2
CLAIMS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED TO BE DISALLOWED
(OBJECTIONS WITHDRAWN)

TOTAL $653,183.89

exhibt 3
TOTAL $1,785,996.00


lg
alexfra die 1.  

Als ich mit meinem Mobil-Teil (ASUS Eee PC 1000H) am langen Arme endlich nach Hause kommen bin, hatte ich schon befürchtet, mich durch alle Dockets förmlich DURCHQUÄLEN zu müssen. - Aber das ist nicht mehr nötig. - Denn das hast Du für uns ALLE hier schon ganz prächtig ERLEDIGT!

Hierdurch kann ich meinen Anteil an der gemeinsam unternommenen Klärung jetzt auf drei Dinge concentrieren:

ERSTENS: Die Einstellung des klärenden Briefes von Ernest & Young.

ZWEITENS: Die GRAPHISCHE Documentierung derer von Dir bereits herausgesuchten und Zahlen-mäßig documentierten Forderungs-Abweisung/en.

DRITTENS: Die VERLINKUNG des wichtigen E&Y-Briefes auf einschlägige HINTERGRUND-Quellen.

Ich danke Dir sehr und wünsche uns Allen:
Einen LEHMAN-grünen Daumen!
LG: Teras.

Die Wirtschafts-Prüfer Ernst & Young, die in denen letzten anderthalb Wochen von einer recht plötzlich für das LEHMAN-Thema begeisterten Presse oft Facten-WIDRIG angangen wurden, lassen sich das nicht länger mehr bieten und schlagen seit dem heutigen DIENSTAG (23.3.2010) ZURÜCK:

"23.03.2010 01:07
TEXT-Ernst & Young's letter about Lehman accounting
March 22 (Reuters) - Auditors at Ernst&Young are firing back at allegations that the 'Big Four' auditor failed to detect accounting tricks at collapsed investment bank Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

Following are excerpts from a letter sent by Ernst&Young partners to client audit committees in the past few days"...

Wir werden uns in denen nächsten Tagen mit dem Hintergrund des oben angerissenen Berichtes sicherlich näher befassen, wofür sich zunächst folgende Quellen anbieten:

ERSTENS: Der LINK auf den oben citierten, vollständigen Text des Presse-Berichts:
http://www.finanznachrichten.de/...er-about-lehman-accounting-020.htm

ZWEITENS: Der Wikipedia-Eintrag in Deutscher Version: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_&_Young

DRITTENS: Die WEB-Site der Gesellschaft / Societät:
http://www.ey.com

Melde mich zu der Sache dann später erneut...

http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/docket/...aspx?rc=1&WebAlias=LBH

7705

2. On March 18, 2010, I caused to be served the “Notice of Reclassification of Property Pursuant
to the Debtors’ Motion Pursuant to Sections 105 and 363 of the Bankruptcy Code and
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019 Authorizing Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. to
Restructure Certain Loans with Broadway Partners Fund Manager, LLC, et. al.,” dated
March 18, 2010 [Docket No. 7649], by causing true and correct copies to be:


7706

3,19 mio gehen von lehman an goldman

7707

2,68 mio gehen von lehman an goldman


7708 - 7723

24130000 mio gehen von lehman an goldman


soweit ich das herauslesen konnte...


lg
alexfra die 1.  

ich freue mich, daß Teras durch dich Unterstützung erfährt.
PDFs kann ich leider nicht durch den Übersetzer jagen, weshalb ich dafür gänzlich ungeeignet bin.

Ich kümmere mich jetzt aber gleich um die Short Interests von gestern.  

morgen auch, ich gebe mein bestes um teras und den ganzen tread, zu unterstützen...auch wenn ich mit dem gerichtsenglisch teilweise sehr auseinandersetzen muss...:-)

lg
alexfra die 1.  

http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100322.txt

MONTAGS-Börse (KEINE Monats-Übersicht):

Date           | Symbol | ShortVolume | TotalVolume | Market |        %

2010-03-22| LEHGQ  |          50.500 |         79.500 | O          =  63,522
2010-03-22| LEHJQ   |         56.300  |       325.130 | O          =  17,316
2010-03-22| LEHKQ  |         16.830  |         92.444 | O          =  18,205
2010-03-22| LEHLQ  |         15.718  |         80.800 | O          =  19,453

2010-03-22| LEHMQ  |       892.018 |    2.637.419 | O          =  33,822

2010-03-22| LEHN     |         15.200 |         28.890 | O          =  52,613
2010-03-22| LEHPQ   |              417 |           2.009 | O          =  20,756  

 

Monday, March 22, 2010
Geithner’s New York Fed Took Trash Off Lehman’s Hands

By Megan Carpentier @ washingtonindependent

The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy examiner’s report is the gift that just keeps on giving to critics of the administration, the bank bailout and the current efforts at financial market reform. Today, Ryan Grim of the Huffington Post reports that Tim Geithner, already under fire for encouraging Goldman Sachs not to disclose how much money it got from the government’s bailout of AIG, also tried to help out Lehman’s bottom line in ways that weren’t kosher. Writes Grim:

As Lehman Brothers careened toward bankruptcy in 2008, the New York Federal Reserve Bank came to its rescue, sopping up junk loans that the investment bank couldn’t sell in the market, according to a report from court-appointed examiner Anton R. Valukas. The New York Fed, under the direction of now-Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, knowingly allowed itself to be used as a “warehouse” for junk loans, the report says, even though Fed guidelines say it can only accept investment grade bonds.

In other words, while Geithner was head of the New York Fed, despite rules that the Fed can’t buy financial instruments that companies can’t sell in the marketplace, it was doing just that in an effort to keep Lehman Brothers solvent. Those bonds, which likely remain less than investment-grade, might well still be on the books.

Grim additionally notes that Geithner, in his position as Treasury Secretary, officially opposes a public audit of the Fed which would, not coincidentally, make public any and all worthless assets the Fed current owns or controls and what it does with its money.

Although the Fed told The New York Times earlier this month that a third party verified the market value of the bonds Lehman used as collateral for loans from the Fed, they did not specify who the third party was. Of course, Lehman’s auditors at Ernst & Young are already implicated in helping Lehman cook their books and fake the value of their derivatives, so the Fed may well have allowed a third party to determine the valuation but, as with the Goldman-AIG valuation debacle, not done a particularly good job at making sure that third party was at all independent.

According to Grim, Lehman’s own internal documents reflected the fact that, third-party valuations or not, the securities they signed over as collateral to the Fed were far from investment-grade.

In other words, the baskets of assets were created for the specific purpose of selling to the Fed for far more than they were worth.Lehman knew it too: “No intention to market” was scrawled on one of the internal presentations about the assets. A separate bank, Citigroup, later characterized the assets as “bottom of the barrel” and “junk” when Lehman tried to push them their way, according to the report.

So at least one third party thought the investments were junk.

Part of the proposed financial reform regulation would require investors to trade derivatives of the kind Lehman sold to the Fed on the open market in order to allow all investors, including the Fed, to have more information and assign them a real market-based value. It is, of course, one of the many provisions that financial companies are fighting tooth and nail, to allow them to continue marketing financial products and services they know full well are junk.  

http://quote.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=LEHMQ&code=BSTK

Nicht immer gaaanz Fehler-frei,
aber jeden Falles um CLASSEN besser als diese unsäglichen "AmericanBulls": http://www.americanbulls.com/...=LEHMQ&MarketTicker=OTC&TYP=S

Goldman Sachs kauft derzeit ohne Ende CLAIMS gegen die LEHMAN Brothers auf und lässt sich das Gekaufte nach Kauf-Abschluss dann jeweils transferren (=übertragen)...

Ein ganz klarer Hinweis darauf, dass diese Forderungen bei gleichbleibendem FACE-Value oder Forderungs-NOMINAL ganz fett im WERTHE zu steigen bestrebt sind; und dies ganz einfach deshalb, weil sich die financielle Stärke derer LEHMAN Brothers Schritt um Schritt weiter ERHOLT.

Ein wichtiger Schritt zur Wieder-Erlangung der financiellen Stärke ist sicherlich die Erfolg-reiche Abweisung UNBERECHTIGTER "Forderungen", wofür uns Alexfra1 ein paar schlagende Beispiele citiert hat...

LG: Teras.

wäre zu wissen welchen Preis die dafür bezahlen. Nochmal eine Frage. Welchen Nachteil hätte denn eigentlich Leh wenn alle Aktien werthaltig bleiben und nicht wertlos verfallen? Irgendwo stand doch geschrieben das die Aktien verfallen sollen?  

Einen klaren SCHLAG-Abtausch ohne dieses Hunds-erbärmliche VERSTECK-Spiel unserer mächtigen Widersacher haben wir uns eigentlich immer gewünscht. - Und jetzt endlich: Wir werden ihn KRIEGEN!

Lehman Examiner Urges Court To Overrule CME Objections
3-23-10 11:42 AM EDT | E-mail Article

"The COURT-appointed examiner of the LEHMAN Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEHMQ) collapse on Tuesday fired BACK at CME Group Inc. (CME), arguing that the exchange operator MUST disclose the identity of firms that bid on portions of Lehman's futures portfolio.

The legal team for Anton VALUKAS told court officials that the PUBLIC has a RIGHT to KNOW which firms got to participate in what amounted to a PRIVATELY arranged fire sale of Lehman positions held at CME, which resulted in a $1.2 billion LOSS to the doomed investment bank.

"The only information that CME seeks to REDACT from the subject documents and keep from public disclosure is the identity of the persons who were permitted to participate in a private auction that apparently resulted in a highly favorable gain to the successful bidders," wrote lawyers for VALUKAS in documents filed Tuesday with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of New York's Southern District.

"Should any of the parties wish to bring claims, despite the Examiner's conclusions, they need to know who received the transfers," VALUKAS' lawyers wrote. "To TEST the ADEQUACY and fairness of the auction PROCESS, the parties need to know who was INVITED[!] to bid."

At issue are THREE documents that remain the LAST obstacle to the FULL publication of the Lehman EXAMINER's report, the bulk of which was released earlier this month in a 2,200-page document"...

Und hier geht es zur QUELLE des obigen Ausschnitts:
http://news.morningstar.com/newsnet/...OWJONESDJONLINE000317_univ.xml

UPDATE:Lehman Examiner Urges Court To Overrule CME Objection
3-23-10 1:15 PM EDT | E-mail Article

(Updates with additional detail from court document.)
By Jacob BUNGE
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

"Lawyers for CME argued Monday that the firms' names should be REDACTED from the three documents, lest the buyers be disadvantaged in the market.

But Valukas' legal team charged Tuesday that bidders for the Lehman book were already named by CME itself in an October 2009 interview between Valukas and Tim DOAR, managing director of risk management for CME, with no claim of confidentiality at the time.

DOAR's disclosure essentially waived any CME argument to redact the bidding firms' names from the full Lehman report, according to Valukas' attorneys.

The Valukas team also took issue with CME's assertion that future emergency auctions could be impeded by concerns that participants would later be identified"...

http://news.morningstar.com/newsnet/...OWJONESDJONLINE000371_univ.xml

UPDATE:Lehman Examiner Urges Court To Overrule CME Objection
Last update: 3/23/2010 1:00:19 PM
(Updates with additional detail from court document.)


By Jacob Bunge
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES


The court-appointed examiner of the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEHMQ) collapse on Tuesday fired back at CME Group Inc. (CME), arguing the identity of firms that bid on portions of the failed bank's futures portfolio must be disclosed.
The legal team for Anton Valukas told court officials the public has a right to know which firms participated in what they viewed as a privately arranged fire sale of Lehman positions held at CME, resulting in an estimated $1.2 billion loss to the doomed investment bank.
"The only information that CME seeks to redact from the subject documents and keep from public disclosure is the identity of the persons who were permitted to participate in a private auction that apparently resulted in a highly favorable gain to the successful bidders," wrote the legal team in documents filed Tuesday with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of New York's Southern District.
At issue are three documents that remain the last obstacle to the full publication of the Lehman examiner's report, the bulk of which was released earlier this month in a 2,200-page nine-volume document.
CME, the world's largest futures exchange, is fighting to keep confidential the identity of six firms that bid to buy chunks of Lehman's futures book held at CME in the days following its historic 2008 bankruptcy filing.
More than $2 billion in Lehman positions were sold on Sept. 18, 2008 to three firms, spanning energy, fixed income and equity-linked futures holdings, as CME worked to wind down Lehman's portfolio.
Valukas' attorneys wrote that an examination of the emergency auction of Lehman assets found nothing untoward. However, his attorneys wrote Tuesday that "the public should be fully informed of the facts," in case other parties should choose to pursue claims.
"To test the adequacy and fairness of the auction process, the parties need to know who was invited to bid," Valukas' lawyers wrote.
Lawyers for CME argued Monday that the firms' names should be redacted from the three documents, lest the buyers be disadvantaged in the market.
But Valukas' legal team charged Tuesday that bidders for the Lehman book were already named by CME itself in an October 2009 interview between Valukas and Tim Doar, managing director of risk management for CME, with no claim of confidentiality at the time.
Doar's disclosure essentially waived any CME argument to redact the bidding firms' names from the full Lehman report, according to Valukas' attorneys.
The Valukas team also took issue with CME's assertion that future emergency auctions could be impeded by concerns that participants would later be identified.
"It is pure speculation that there will ever be another Lehman, that there will be another need for the CME to do what it has now done once in its entire existence," Valukas' lawyers wrote Tuesday.
"The Court can safely take notice of the undeniable fact that where there are billions to be made, traders will step up, publicity or not."
-By Jacob Bunge, Dow Jones Newswires; 312-750-4117; jacob.bunge@dowjones.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
March 23, 2010 13:00 ET (17:00 GMT)  

Was heißt das bitte auf deutsch.

geht es hier um die vollständige Offenlegung des Berichtes von Valukas?

Oder geht es um noch mehr?  

Genau DARUM geht es; und wie Du ganz richtig erkannt hast,
geht es zugleich noch um ganz viel MEHR!

LG: Teras.

abend teras,

interessanter post...was bedeutet diese offenlegung für unsere lehman?

wird sich dies im kurs bemerkbar machen?

ich denke wir brauchen signifikante, starke news, um aus dieser lethargie zu erwachen...


lg
alexfra die 1.  

Der in meinem obigen Beitrag #5689  www.ariva.de/_geht_der_KAMPF_los_t344623?pnr=7702891#jump7702891  citierte PRESSE-Bericht ist insofern nicht nur interessant, sondern geradezu SENSATIONELL, als in ihm nur noch von DREIEN als REDACTED (=geschwärzt oder Teil-weise geschwärzt) ausgewiesenen Schrift-Stücken die Rede ist:

"At issue are THREE documents that remain the LAST obstacle to the FULL publication of the Lehman EXAMINER's report, the bulk of which was released earlier this month in a 2,200-page document"...

Demnach sind inzwischen auch die Goldman-SACHS-related Papers vollständig ENT-siegelt, die mir noch aus der letzten Woche lediglich im Zustand REDACTED bekannt sind.

Ich werde jedes einzelne dieser Schrift-Stücke heute Nacht erneut anclicken, um mich persönlich davon zu überzeugen, dass sie inzwischen Tat-sächlich ENT-siegelt sind...

LG: Teras.

http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20100323.txt

DIENSTAGS-Börse (KEINE Monats-Übersicht):

Date           | Symbol | ShortVolume | TotalVolume | Market |        %

2010-03-23| LEHCQ |            5.000 |          25.500 | O         =    19,608
2010-03-23| LEHDQ |            2.833 |            2.833 | O         =  100,000
2010-03-23| LEHJQ  |        248.091 |        472.275 | O         =    52,743
2010-03-23| LEHKQ |               400 |          10.450 | O         =      3,828
2010-03-23| LEHLQ |          10.000 |          13.913 | O         =    70,875

2010-03-23| LEHMQ |    1.909.711 |     4.626.963 | O         =    41,274  

kann die mal jemand deuten - beurteilen - interpretieren
da hat es ja schon interessante Zahlen dabei.

Danke Lou  

es sind wieder claims an verschiedene parteien gegangen...siehe hier:

http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/docket/...aspx?rc=1&WebAlias=LBH


es sind noch ein paar andere interessante dockets dabei...werde mich diesen morgen widmen, falls es bis dato noch niemand anderes gemacht hat;-)

gut nacht
alexfra die 1.  

Wir beginnen zunächst mit dem GERICHTS-Beschluss, auf den der jüngste
VORSTOß  http://www.ariva.de/_t344623?pnr=7702891#jump7702891  
des Examiner's Anton R. VALUKAS sich stützt:

Docket #7530: 3/11/2010 Order SIGNED on 3/11/2010 to Establish A PROCEDURE to UNSEAL The Examiner's REPORT, To Establish a Briefing Schedule To RESOLVE Remaining Confidentiality Issues, and To Establish A Procedure To Provide ACCESS To Documents Cited In The Examiner's Report. (Related Doc # 7026 ) (Lopez, Mary) (Entered: 03/11/2010)  
Debtor: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Related: 7026

Centraler Link HIER:
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/docket/...aspx?rc=1&WebAlias=LBH

Und nach dessen Anclicken geht's dann HIER zum DOCUMENT des Docket's #7530:
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/document/....aspx?DocumentId=1152177

Und nach der Erinnerung des GERICHTS-Beschlusses, auf den der jüngste
VORSTOß  http://www.ariva.de/_t344623?pnr=7702891#jump7702891  
des Examiner's Anton R. VALUKAS sich stützt, documentieren wir den Vorstoß SELBST:  

Docket #7727: 3/23/2010 RESPONSE / Examiner's RESPONSE to the Objection of the CME Group Inc. to the UNSEALING of the Examiner's REPORT (related document(s)[7530]) filed by Patrick J. Trostle on behalf of Anton R. VALUKAS. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed ORDER, # (2) DECLARATION) (Trostle, Patrick)  
Debtor: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.  
Related: 7530

Centraler Link HIER:
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/docket/...aspx?rc=1&WebAlias=LBH
Und nach dessen Aufruf geht's dann HIER zu denen DOCUMENTS des Docket's #7727:

MAIN Document:
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/document/....aspx?DocumentId=1157594
Proposed ORDER:
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/document/....aspx?DocumentId=1157595
DECLARATION:
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/document/....aspx?DocumentId=1157596