Ambac Rocky Balboa oder chapter 11
Seite 221 von 309 Neuester Beitrag: 25.04.21 01:14 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 14.05.09 22:36 | von: pacorubio | Anzahl Beiträge: | 8.707 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 25.04.21 01:14 | von: Petraqnvka | Leser gesamt: | 1.363.699 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 302 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 219 | 220 | | 222 | 223 | ... 309 > |
ich habe nie behauptet und es auch nie so verstanden dass ich ein Loser bin
Loser sind doch nur die die sich als loser empfinden, also bitte (um in Deinem Jargon zu sprechen)
an die Gurgel gehe ich hier Dir doch nicht oder empfindest Du das so???, oh dann tuts mir leid ich wolllte nicht die "miniwinis" bei Dir auslösen, na bei drei Frauen im Haus kann das vielleicht leicht passieren, kenne ich:-)
aber immer easy bleiben, schnapp Dir Dein horse mach die Kippe an und ab durch Hamburgs Prärie .-)
Immer schön langsam mit den Pferden, Pacorubio.
Das bedeutet auch für Dich langsamer in die Pedalen treten.
Hi,
nur zur Erinnerung - von alpenklimmer am 07,05, hier eingestellt (danke)
NEW YORK, May 06, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (Ambac) announced today that it will release its first quarter 2011 results on May 10, 2011, after the market close. Management will not host a conference call to discuss the first quarter results.
MfG
dann sind das Gauklerzahlen der Leute die an der Börse arbeiten......
lt. Ariva.....0,097€ = ./. 4,91%...........und wenn man richtig schaut......NIIIXXXX.
I hate it....
* Lead plaintiffs in Ambac Financial Group Inc securities litigation
say reached settlements -- court filing
* Lead plaintiffs say settlements are with Ambac, individual defendants,
underwriter defendants
* Lead plaintiffs say Ambac would pay $2.5 million, and its insurers would pay
$24.6 million
* Lead plaintiffs say underwriter defendants would pay $5.9 million
* Lead plaintiffs say underwriter defendants include several large banks
((New York Equities Desk; tel: +1 646 223 6000))
* Ambac filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in November
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, May 6 (Reuters) - Ambac Financial Group Inc
, insurers and some of its bank underwriters agreed to pay $33 million to settle investor litigation that accused the bond insurer of hiding the risks it took on by guaranteeing risky mortgage debt.
Ambac will pay $2.5 million already being held in escrow, while insurers for its officers and directors will pay $24.6 million, according to settlement papers filed with the federal court in Manhattan. Seven banks will pay $5.9 million under a separate settlement, the papers show.
Court approval is required for both settlements.
Once the nation's second-largest bond insurer, Ambac filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection from creditors last Nov. 8. A restructuring of larger rival MBIA Inc , which like Ambac suffered large losses insuring risky mortgage debt, is being challenged in New York's highest court.
"We're pleased with these settlements, which we think are a very good result for the class, particularly since Ambac is in bankruptcy," Steven Singer, a partner at Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, which represented the investors, said in an interview.
Ambac did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
The investors accused Ambac and officials including former Chief Executive Robert Genader of misleading them into believing the company insured only "the safest" transactions.
Instead, they said Ambac reached for profit by guaranteeing billions of dollars of risky collateralized debt obligations and residential mortgage debt, and writing credit default swaps to protect investors in the debt against default.
The complaint quoted a 2006 internal memo from an Ambac managing director who, referring to some Ambac-backed debt, told a company credit risk committee that some of their own underwriters "would not touch [them] with a ten foot pole."
The lawsuit covered investors who bought Ambac stock and bonds between Oct. 25, 2006 and April 22, 2008, as a Feb. 2007 Ambac subordinated debt issue known as a DISCS offering.
Lead plaintiffs are the Public School Teachers' Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago, the Arkansas Teachers Retirement System and the Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi.
The banks included Bank of America Corp , Citigroup Inc , Goldman Sachs Group Inc , HSBC Holdings Plc
, JPMorgan Chase & Co , UBS AG and Wells Fargo & Co , court papers show.
The case is In re: Ambac Financial Group Inc Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 08-00411.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York, editing by Bernard Orr)
((jon.stempel@thomsonreuters.com +1 646 223 6317; Reuters Messaging: jon.stempel.reuters.com@reuters.net)) Keywords: AMBAC/SETTLEMENT
Hi,
ich stelle fest, du verfolgst weiterhin WaMu und Ambac.
Was ist ein gutes Quartalsergebnis für Ambac? Nach den Überlegungen für das 4. Quartal könnten es 100 Mill. $ je Monat sein. Aber ist das nicht utopisch, wenn gar keine Neugeschäfte gemacht werden (dürfen) ? Oder stimmt das mit dem Verbot der Neugeschäfte gar nicht?
MfG
Utopisch/Nicht utopisch......wer weiß das schon........
Wenn ich einen "langfristigen" Ratenvertrag abschließe, dann erziele ich daraus für einen längeren Zeitraum Einnahmen........
Gruß
Schau einfach mal auf die alten Kurse von/bis Mitte 2007..........
(Das heisst aber nicht, das es da wieder hingeht)
Wenn z.B. Ambac doch am Markt verkauft werden würde, spielt der Firmenwert eine große, wenn nicht sogar die Rolle....(18,88 Mrd.$)......dann rechne mal aus, was effektiv/im günstigsten Fall für die Aktionäre bleibt...... :-)
Ein paar Zahlen.........
Valuation Measures
Market Cap (intraday)5: 40.83 Mio.$
Enterprise Value (May 3, 2011)3: 18.88 Mrd.$
Schuldforderungen inkl. IRS ~ 1,9 Mrd. $
Alles natürlich nur "Hirngespinste", die zwar möglich aber wohl nicht machbar sind, und ausserdem....träumen darf man ja.........
http://www.teleboerse.de/nachrichten/...istet-aus-article3296586.html
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/...ettle-securities-suits-2011-05-09
Total stockholder deficit
-$2093,8M
BV about -$6,93 per share
IMO common will survive only if there is a huge putbacks before end of summer.
Three months Ended March 31, 2011 | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Loss reserves at December 31, net of subrogation recoverable and reinsurance | $ | 4,424,450 | $ | 3,777,321 | ||||
Impact of adopting ASU 2009-17 | — | (503,887 | ) | |||||
Beginning balance of net loss reserves, net of subrogation recoverable and reinsurance | 4,424,450 | 3,273,434 | ||||||
Changes in the loss reserves due to: | ||||||||
Current year: | ||||||||
Establishment of new loss reserves, gross of subrogation and net of reinsurance | 249,774 | 266,913 | ||||||
Claim (payments) recoveries, net of reinsurance | 195 | (874 | ) | |||||
Establishment of subrogation recoveries, net of reinsurance | (34,252 | ) | (342,979 | ) | ||||
Total current year | 215,717 | (76,940 | ) | |||||
Prior year: | ||||||||
Change in previously established loss reserves, gross of subrogation and net of reinsurance | 758,781 | 822,848 | ||||||
Change in previously established subrogation recoveries, net of reinsurance | (46,765 | ) | (26,864 | ) | ||||
Claim payments, net of subrogation recoverable and reinsurance | 6,676 | (244,661 | ) | |||||
Total prior year | 718,692 | 551,323 | ||||||
Changes in loss reserves | 934,409 | 474,383 | ||||||
Deconsolidation of certain VIEs under ASU 2009-17 | — | 676,633 | ||||||
Ending loss reserves, net of subrogation recoverable and reinsurance | $ | 5,358,859 | $ | 4,424,450 | ||||
Ambac Rating | CLO | Other | Total | |||||||||
AAA | $ | 247,583 | $ | 2,138,007 | $ | 2,385,590 | ||||||
AA | 8,566,193 | 1,026,674 | 9,592,867 | |||||||||
A | 2,580,317 | 2,817,642 | 5,397,959 | |||||||||
BBB | 31,938 | 621,985 | 653,923 | |||||||||
Below investment grade | — | 242,915 | 242,915 | |||||||||
$ | 11,426,031 | $ | 6,847,223 | $ | 18,273,254 | |||||||
Three months ended March 31, | Financial Guarantee | Financial Services | Corporate and Other | Inter- segment Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
2011: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated customers | $ | 175,011 | $ | 28,195 | $ | 77 | $ | — | $ | 203,283 | ||||||||||
Inter-segment | 22,679 | (22,605 | ) | — | (74 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 197,690 | $ | 5,590 | $ | 77 | $ | (74 | ) | $ | 203,283 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated customers | $ | (815,081 | ) | $ | 23,390 | $ | (400 | ) | $ | — | $ | (792,091 | ) | |||||||
Inter-segment | 21,290 | (21,826 | ) | 536 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total income before income taxes | $ | (793,791 | ) | $ | 1,564 | $ | 136 | $ | — | $ | (792,091 | ) | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | 25,895,317 | $ | 1,447,059 | $ | 67,928 | $ | — | $ | 27,410,304 | ||||||||||
2010: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated customers | $ | (449,155 | ) | $ | (50,288 | ) | $ | 304 | $ | — | $ | (499,139 | ) | |||||||
Inter-segment | 31,632 | (31,528 | ) | — | (104 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | (417,523 | ) | $ | (81,816 | ) | $ | 304 | $ | (104 | ) | $ | (499,139 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated customers | $ | (588,803 | ) | $ | (59,349 | ) | $ | (41,803 | ) | $ | — | $ | (689,955 | ) | ||||||
Inter-segment | 29,505 | (30,200 | ) | 695 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total income before income taxes | $ | (559,298 | ) | $ | (89,549 | ) | $ | (41,108 | ) | $ | — | $ | (689,955 | ) | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 33,877,547 | $ | 1,804,928 | $ | 133,202 | $ | — | $ | 35,815,677 | ||||||||||
ein positives wertvolles Exposure von 300 Mrd und eins das alle Risiken umspannt von ca. 127 Mrd, wenn man einen Vergleich zwischen gut und schlecht darstellen will.
In Q1 hat man die Reserven um 900 Millionen erhöht. Sollte ihr bedenken.
Das Ergebnis beinhaltet bei den -2 Mrd Defizit auch die 1,71 Mrd Anleihschulden der Holding. Zieht man diese Summe ab, so hat man ca. -300 Millionen. Darüber würde ich mal stark nachdenken, denn wir wissen nicht ob die IRS tatsächlich 700 Millionen bekommt. Ziehe ich davon die 700 Millionen ab, dann wäre ich ja im Plus und müsste nur noch die Anleihen immer bedienen.
Weiterhin gilt, die Aktie ist riskanter als die Anleihe. Doch die Reserven belaufen sich nun auf 5,4 Mrd.
Hi,
ausführlicher s.o. bei Marlboromann (danke dafür)
"Am Dienstag berichtete Ambac, dass im letzten Viertel es einen Verlust von $ 819,3 Millionen, oder 2.71 $ pro Anteil, im Vergleich zu einem mit dem Jahr früheren Verlust von $ 690,1 Millionen, oder 2.39 $ pro Anteil hatte.
Gesamtnettoverlust- und Verlust-Ausgaben stiegen mehr als 10-fach zu $ 919,6 Millionen auf.
Verdiente Nettoprämien verminderten 27 % zu $ 91,8 Millionen, während Nettoinvestitionseinkommen 39 % zu $ 71,7 Millionen fiel."
aus Market Watch von heute
Die o.a. Ausführungen von Marlboromann relativieren diesen zunächst negativen Eindruck.
Aber ein "Hurra" an der Börse erwarte ich für heute nicht.