2 Milliarden $: Patriot Scientific gegen intel
Seite 41 von 136 Neuester Beitrag: 25.04.21 03:01 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 18.03.04 14:29 | von: aida73 | Anzahl Beiträge: | 4.387 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 25.04.21 03:01 | von: Silkelwtpa | Leser gesamt: | 344.960 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 11 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 38 | 39 | 40 | | 42 | 43 | 44 | ... 136 > |
Ist aber ansonsten nur zum zocken, werden eventuell übernommen oder es gibt gar nichts
Der Prozess mit intel läuft noch, nur die Entscheidung ob der Patentanwalt von damal aussagen darf wurde negativ beurteilt
Patriot hat die Unterlagen über das alleinige patent, die Gegenseite hat nichts (Unterlagen wurden verlegt...ja, meine Oma sitzt im Hünerstall und strickt Panzer...klar doch)
und den Rest musste dir schon selbst erlesen
Zunächst ist aber jetzt die Veröffentlichung nach Börsenschluss interessant.
Wie zum Teufel findet man solche Werte???Google or what...
Möchte auch solche Firmen oder Penny Stocks finden...
please answer...thx and greets
Ich investiere sonst mittel- und langfristig, aber nun möchte ich auch ein wenig zocken:-)
Nur mal so a bissl...
ALSO: WIE FINDE ICH FÜR MICH ( und wenn ich eine entdecke auch für EUCH ) solche Werte
E-mail or Print this story
31 March 2005, 4:01pm ET
SAN DIEGO, March 31 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Patriot Scientific Corporation (BB:PTSC) announced today results for the third quarter and nine months ended February 28, 2005. Revenue for the third fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2005 was approximately $2.9 million, up from revenue of $3,384 for the period ended February 29, 2004. Net income for the third quarter was approximately $600,000, or $0.00 per diluted share, compared to a net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 of $975,894, or $0.01 per share.
Revenue for the nine months ended February 28, 2005 was approximately $2.9 million, up from revenue of $66,584 for the nine months ended February 29, 2004. Net loss for the nine months ended February 28, 2005 was approximately $1.5 million, or $0.01 per share, compared to a net loss of $3,001,231, or $0.02 per share, for the nine months ended February 29, 2004.
Jeff Wallin, president and CEO of Patriot Scientific, said, "This quarterly profit resulted from licensing agreements for our microprocessor patent portfolio of seven issued patents and our core technology, the IGNITE microprocessor. The patent portfolio license was the first granted under our focused strategy to assure that users of our technology remunerate Patriot. The positive net income in the quarter was negatively impacted by $1.2 million in interest charges. However, as a result of the cash flow from the licensing agreements, we expect to eliminate the need for financings with high interest costs and resultant dilution. For the nine months, an interest charge of $2.4 million accounted for the $1.5 million loss. At the end of the quarter, we had over $1 million in cash and short-term investments, $2.7 million in license fees receivable and approximately $3 million of working capital.
"We are accelerating our licensing policy, which we anticipate will result in additional licensing or settlement fees," Wallin continued. "We also are pursuing our current litigation (Case Number C040439), in which we claim full ownership of one of the more significant patents in the portfolio. Recently, Judge Fogel of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order disqualifying our counsel and prohibiting the testimony of our original patent prosecution attorney. We are currently interviewing alternative counsel to continue the case following a reconsideration motion denied by Judge Fogel."
About Patriot Scientific
Mentioned Last Change
PTSC 0.09 0.022dollars or (19.64%)
Patriot Scientific is an intellectual property company, developing and marketing innovative and proprietary semiconductor technologies into the fast- growing handheld wireless and smart card markets. The company's portfolio of patents encompasses what is believed to be fundamental microprocessor technology and includes additional patents pending to protect its technology and architecture.
For Patriot Scientific information, contact Lowell Giffhorn at (858) 674-5018. Detailed information about Patriot Scientific can be found on the website http://www.ptsc.com . Copies of Patriot Scientific press releases, current price quotes, stock charts and other valuable information for investors may be found on the websites http://www.hawkassociates.com and http://www.hawkmicrocaps.com .
An investment profile on Patriot Scientific may be found at http://www.hawkassociates.com/patriot/profile.htm .
For investor relations information, contact Frank Hawkins or Julie Marshall, Hawk Associates, at (305) 852-2383, e-mail: info@hawkassociates.com .
Media contact: Daryl Toor, Attention Group, (770) 777-9489, e-mail: dtoor@attentiongroup.com .
Safe Harbor statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this news release looking forward in time involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks associated with the effect of changing economic conditions, trends in the products markets, variations in the company's cash flow, market acceptance risks, technical development risks, uncertainties related to litigation, seasonality and other risk factors detailed in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
SOURCE Patriot Scientific Corporation
-0- 03/31/2005
/CONTACT: Lowell Giffhorn, Patriot Scientific, +1-858-674-5018; or
Investors, Frank Hawkins or Julie Marshall, both of Hawk Associates,
+1-305-852-2383, or
also
good luck
01 Apr 2005, 07:57 AM EST
Msg. 72367 of 72368
(This msg. is a reply to 72363 by bigfella41.)
Jump to msg. #
I think personally it was a great snow job by AMD to present what they did with PTSC as a "we needed to cover our butts" to the general media and they bought it. The media has always presented PTSC products, their chips, as "controversial".
AMD doesn't want anyone to know their internal business, especially INTC, so by deploying the mindset of "CYA", and making PTSC sign a long term NDA, most of what we want to know about the long term relationship with AMD will never come out though media outlets. Thats exactly the way AMD wants it, as in don't spell out that we needed a .03 cent stock to bring our consumer products up to par and beyond.
AMD's general plan was well thought out regarding the why, when and where of actually finding the technology to enter just what you mentioned: "consumer market".