silverado goldmines (867737)
zb. hier eine Meinung :
Die Zukunft liegt nicht im CTL (wegen des 6-fachen Wasserbedarfs)sondern im EL.Kraftwerkbetrieb mit Kohlespeisung.Und das will Silverado ja im Moment in Mississippi anwenden um das anliegende Kraftwerk mit Energie zu versorgen.Hie sehe auch ich die Zukunft.
http://democrats.science.house.gov/Media/File/...t/romm_testimony.pdf
bis bald
da bin ich mal 24std. aus dem Haus und erlebe so einen netten "run" ab 19:30Uhr nicht!
Wir deutschen mußten wieder zuschauen, besser gesagt die nicht investierten deutschen!
der P&F Chart regenerierte ja ein bullish price ziel von 0,1$ schon letzte Woche... wie auch immer!
Muß jetzt erstmal in meinem Chartheft schauen!
Optionen
| Boardmail an "tornadotoni" |
Wertpapier: Silverado Gold Mines |
Angehängte Grafik:
chart.png
chart.png
mit Raketen um zu gehen
...
Ne sind doch normal Vorbörsliche Fehldaten!
Im Amiland sind die Indis natürlich gedreht gekreutzt usw, alles bestens!
Das Hauptaugenmerk werden wir nun auf das Volumen haben, das ist aus meiner Sicht das ratsamste!
Bin mal auf Deutschland gleich gespannt, den groß gewinne kann keiner rausziehen ohne das der Kurs wieder auf 0,05 fällt!
Unsere Gewinnmitnahmen können nur geschluckt werden wenn im Amiland die post abgeht.... schade ich bin ab mittag wieder nicht daheim!
Optionen
| Boardmail an "tornadotoni" |
Wertpapier: Silverado Gold Mines |
Angehängte Grafik:
chart.png (verkleinert auf 60%)
chart.png (verkleinert auf 60%)
Finally, Coal Wins Needed Attention
Posted Thursday, September 6, 2007 ; 06:00 AM
This nation's economy depends on secure, affordable energy. Coal plays a key role in meeting that need.
Congress, supposedly engaged in an energy debate, somehow has managed to avoid focusing on coal. That sort of leadership won't keep the lights on.
But U.S. Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., believes Congress will address coal-to-liquid manufacturing this fall. Let's hope so.
And here's some more good news -- maybe: The Bush administration seems interested in creating more predictability for companies that must invest millions of dollars to mine coal. Given the federal courts' assault on coal, it's about time.
This nation's economy depends on secure, affordable energy. Coal plays a key role in meeting that need. The federal government must recognize that reality.
Copyright 2007 West Virginia Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Coal Under Pressure
Posted Thursday, September 6, 2007 ; 06:00 AM
ndustry consolidation appears possible as companies cope with challenges.
Story by Pam Kasey Email | Bio
Like the rock itself, coal as an industry is under pressure.
There has been talk for several years now about upward pressure on production and prices.
Demand for electricity is only going up, it's been said, and more than 130 coal-fired power plants are planned nationwide to provide it.
Also, some believe coal is needed in the form of liquid transportation fuels -- coal-to-liquids, or CTL -- to help reduce the nation's reliance on imported oil.
But recently, there's strong downward pressure as well.
Demand, for example, hasn't grown as quickly as expected.
Those many new coal-fired power plants aren't materializing. In fact, plants in Texas, North Carolina and Florida, as well as others, were cancelled earlier this year.
CTL isn't coming in a hurry, either. Federal lawmakers declined to include in early versions of this year's energy bill the loans or price supports that many say are needed to make it happen.
There are other pressures, too:
* A high cost of doing business in West Virginia, due in part to U.S. District Judge Robert "Chuck" Chambers' June decision that outlawed sediment ponds in mountain top mining.
* Ongoing uncertainty over greenhouse gas legislation, which the House of Representatives has promised to review this fall.
* And on top of all that, tax credits for the production of coal synfuel expiring at the end of the year.
"Most analysts and most people in the industry are in agreement that production is likely to decline in central Appalachia over the next few years to the end of the decade because of those pressures," said Hill and Associates coal market analyst Jim Truman.
Central Appalachian coal, which in West Virginia is southern coal, represented nearly three-quarters of the state's production in 2006.
More Consolidation Possible
Something has to give when prices that were recently $60 a ton plunge into the $40s.
"There's a lot of mines that were opened two or three years ago that are now no longer economic," said Alan Stagg, president of Stagg Resource Consultants in Charleston. "You're going to see some shakeout if prices stay where they are."
Difficult conditions have led to consolidation in the industry during the past decade.
Truman shared data showing that in 1995 no central Appalachian coal producer stood apart from the pack. Massey Energy Co. came in at the top with 24 million tons per year, Ashland Coal Inc. a little lower at 21 million, Arch Mineral Corp. at 19 million, and producers ranged smoothly down from there.
By 2005, Massey dominated the field with 43 million tons. The second largest producer, Arch spin-off Magnum Coal Co., came in at only 17 million.
High costs continue to make conditions tough for the little guy.
"I think in reality it's going to take more time to get permits (following) the Chambers decision, depending on whether or not it's upheld," Truman said.
"It's harder for a small operator to do that," he continued. "Most people believe, and we do too, that as a result of this there will probably be some more consolidation in the industry going forward."
The larger market context is stacked against a coal industry rife with small operators, too.
"In general, coal miners have minimal pricing power due to resource abundance and severe fragmentation versus heavily consolidated rails and utilities," read a July Citigroup industry analysis. "Our sense is that within three years the industry will be significantly consolidated."
Stagg sees more of a cyclical process in which large companies alternately aggregate smaller ones then spin off less useful properties, not necessarily resulting in fewer and fewer companies.
But Truman thinks consolidation could be good for the state's economy.
"Probably more production -- or less of a decline -- would be able to come out of this region if it were controlled by larger companies than if it were not," he said. "That would mean more jobs; it would mean more everything that comes with those jobs."
Environmental Concerns
Coal likely has a strong role in the longer run, everyone agrees, and that's mainly because there is still no clear alternative for coal's half of the ever-growing demand for electricity.
But the pressure is on to resolve environmental concerns.
"What I think we need to concentrate on is building power plants here in West Virginia because we're good at it. We know how to mine coal; we know how to scrub it," said West Virginia Coal Association President Bill Raney, reflecting on the market opportunity for coal.
"And (we need to) really begin to pursue the no-emissions power plant," he added in acknowledgment of the environmental concerns.
Those concerns are getting federal attention now.
A draft rule issued in August by the federal Office of Surface Mining may resolve questions about past legal decision. Congress may revisit CTL supports when the houses meet to negotiate a final energy bill after recess. And the House finally may work through the greenhouse gas issue.
With the resolution of those questions, the downward pressure on coal may be relieved.
Copyright 2007 West Virginia Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Getting Burned
Andrew T. Gillies, 09.05.07, 5:50 PM ET
Washington, D.C. -
As the table below indicates, Wall Street has cooled on the coal business lately. Particularly hard hit, in share price terms at least, have been two concerns, Headwaters and Rentech, specializing in turning coal into liquid fuel.
At a Wednesday hearing on Capitol Hill, those two companies pleaded for Washington to nurture the fledgling coal-to-liquid industry.
“Oil price volatility continues to discourage potential [coal-to-liquid] investors,” Robert Freerks, Rentech’s (amex: RTK - news - people ) director of product development, told the House Committee on Science and Technology’s Subcommittee on Energy and Environment. “Congress should enact policy to help reduce risk and encourage investment in these plants.”
“Until we get the first few plants built, there’s tremendous resistance from the private capital market,” agreed John Ward, Headwaters' (nyse: HW - news - people ) vice president for marketing and government affairs (note: half of Headwaters’ sales come from residential construction materials).
As we’ve observed elsewhere, (See: "Its Not Easy Being Green"], Washington tends to stand by long-shot energy technologies, even after the stock market has given them the thumbs-down. But the members at today’s hearing weren’t an easy audience.
Some background: coal-to-liquid (CTL) technology has been around since the 1920s and was honed by Germans as they struggled to find petroleum substitutes during the Second World War. CTL begins with the feedstock (coal), which is subjected to intense heat and pressure to create a gas comprised of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. The gas gets cleaned of impurities (mercury, sulfur), then gets put through a catalytic chemical reaction, known as Fischer-Tropsch, to make it into liquid fuel.
Over the decades, the advance of CTL technology has staggered forward, periodically tripped up by declines in oil prices. In 2000, Congress designated domestically produced Fischer-Tropsch fuels as an “alternative fuel.” The Energy Policy Act of 2005 added tax credits, loan guarantees and other incentives for CTL. And as we reported (See: "Coal's Many Friends"), recent high oil prices have prompted congressional proposals for CTL mandates, one worth as much as $8 billion.
At today’s hearing, however, the coal crowd caught flak from the left and right. “Perhaps I could be convinced that coal-to-liquid is a good idea for transportation purposes, but I come with great skepticism about whether it could work or whether it’s desirable,” said ranking subcommittee member Rep. Bob Inglis, R-S.C.
“Why don’t you just burn the coal?” carped Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md. “There’s no better way to get energy out of any product than simply to burn it.”
Fellow panelists also took shots at CTL. David Hawkins, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Climate Center, pointed out that even if 85% of the greenhouse gas from CTL production could be captured and stashed below ground, that would mean a 20% increase over greenhouse gas emissions from conventional fuels.
“Coal-to-liquid is just a dead end, from a climate perspective,” added Joseph Romm, a senior fellow at the liberal-leaning Center for American Progress. “Liquid coal will not have a future in this country, no matter how much money Congress squanders on it.”
To be sure, Headwaters and Rentech’s reps gave as good as they got, arguing CTL could serve as a transition to nascent energy sources like hydrogen and biomass. They also vigorously framed the issue as one of economics and national security. “Some of the dollars we now send overseas to buy oil would be kept at home to develop American jobs utilizing American energy resources,” argued Headwaters’ Ward.
Those arguments seemed to please some members, particularly those who acknowledged having CTL operations in their states. But the debate left others unsatisfied. “I’ve got, like, 100 more questions,” said Rep. Baron Hill (D-Ind.) after five minutes of questioning the panel.
Here’s a question--given recent market weakness, is the coal biz a stock buy now? In a note to clients today, Arlington investment bank Friedman, Billings, Ramsey warned of headline risk through October as Congress takes up coal-related topics such as climate change and mountaintop-removal mining techniques. In the table below, certain stocks look cheap relative to valuation history. But buyers may want to wait a few months.
Coal Concerns
Company
Price§
§
Change From 52-Week High
Price/Sales§
§
Price/Sales, 5-Year Average
Alliance Holdings (nasdaq: AHGP - news - people )
$26.14§
-22%§
1.5§
1.2
§
Alpha Natural Resources (nyse: ANR - news - people )
19.84§
-11§
0.7§
0.6
§
Arch Coal (nyse: ACI - news - people )
30.14§
-29§
1.8§
1.3
§
Consol Energy (nyse: CNX - news - people )
40.05§
-20§
2.0§
1.3
§
Foundation Coal Holdings (nyse: FCL - news - people )
35.15§
-22§
1.1§
1.2
§
Headwaters (nyse: HW - news - people )
16.20§
-38§
0.6§
1.7
§
International Coal Group (nyse: ICO - news - people )
4.05§
-38§
0.7§
1.3
§
Massey Energy (nyse: MEE - news - people )
20.69§
-33§
0.7§
1.1
§
Natural Resource Partners (nyse: NRP - news - people )
33.00§
-23§
11.7§
10.3
§
Peabody Energy (nyse: BTU - news - people )
43.25§
-22§
2.2§
1.5
§
Rentech (amex: RTK - news - people )
2.46§
-53§
3.3§
NM
§
Westmoreland Coal (amex: WLB - news - people )
20.25§
-30§
0.4§
0.5
§
Yanzhou Coal Mining Co. (nyse: YZC - news - people )
85.70§
-8§
4.9§
2.4
§
Prices as of Sept. 5. NM: Not meaningful. Sources: FT Interactive Data and Reuters Fundamentals via FactSet Research Systems.
Financing Questions Pose Problems for Coal-To-Liquid Projects
Posted Thursday, September 6, 2007 ; 06:00 AM
CTL proponents look to the fall for Congress to help provide some financial certainty to the industry.
Story by Pam Kasey Email | Bio
Although it's been nearly two years since Gov. Joe Manchin announced the West Virginia Coal Conversion Initiative in October 2005, the coal-to-liquid fuels industry it aimed to create is barely in its infancy.
That same situation is mirrored across the nation: Often cited as a solution to the nation's dependence on imported oil, liquid transportation fuels from coal nevertheless are getting a slow start.
What is holding the industry back?
Money and CO2
The coal-to-diesel plant that Los Angeles-based Rentech Inc. has proposed for Mingo County is the bright spot in West Virginia's coal-to-liquids, or CTL, industry.
The main obstacle to the development of the industry is money, according to Rentech Senior Vice President for Government Affairs and Corporate Communications Tom Sayles.
"The financing is the big challenge, right?" Sayles asked rhetorically.
"There's some concern on the part of bankers that there's a certain amount of commodity risk that goes along with these plants," he said. "That is to say that, if (the price of) oil were to precipitously fall, what would that to do the economics of the project?"
Other producers agree. Executives with coal-to-liquid companies such as Baard Energy LLC and Sasol North America made similar statements at the Coal-To-Liquids Coalition summit in Beaver earlier this month.
A second obstacle involves the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.
"What you'll hear from some of the environmental community is that the production process for making CTL is twice as dirty as it is for petroleum-based fuels," Sayles said, "but that assumes you don't use any modern production techniques and don't do any sequestration."
U.S. Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., has been a strong proponent of CTL in West Virginia.
"What is needed in order to quickly develop a full-scale CTL industry that can reduce our dependence on foreign oil in the next decade is large investment in the near-term," he said, "and government and business are both looking seriously at how to accomplish that."
Energy Bill
CTL proponents widely expected that supports for the industry would be included in the 2007 federal energy bill.
Supports that were discussed widely earlier in the year included government subsidies for up to 10 coal-to-liquid plants and guarantee of a minimum market through long-term contracts with the U.S. Air Force.
But when the U.S. Senate and then the House of Representatives finished their bills over the summer, neither version mentioned it.
It's not over, according to Sayles.
"We're told those issues were deferred to the fall, and they'll come up again" when the two versions of the bill are negotiated in conference committee, he said.
Lawmakers could reassure the financing community through price supports for CTL, a possibility Rahall confirmed is under discussion.
"The expectation is that any energy-related debate taken up in Congress this fall is certain to include efforts to provide for a CTL industry," Rahall said. "The Congress has been looking at numerous options to help provide some financial certainty to the industry, including loan guarantees and price floors that will ensure that CTL can still compete even in the event that oil prices drop in the future."
Rentech likes the idea of a price floor.
"We support the voucher bill," Sayles said, "which provides a price floor and a ceiling over that price, a kind of risk-sharing with the government. If the government could minimize some of that real or perceived commodity risk, it would go a long way to expediting the development of the industry."
Lawmakers could address greenhouse gas concerns in the energy bill, too.
"Rentech at least has taken the view that the way to solve that is to apply a standard across the board to CTL (and CTL-based fuels), a standard that says that the plants producing those products should be cleaner than the products they'll be replacing," Sayles said.
Rentech's production process captures significant amounts of CO2, he said. The company currently is studying options near the proposed Mingo County plant for using the captured CO2 to assist in the recovery of coalbed methane, leaving the CO2 stored, or sequestered, underground.
Rahall pointed out that the House energy legislation did include language initiating a framework that enables sequestration.
Rentech also is considering an alternative process -- "CBTL" -- that would use biomass as part of the feedstock, reducing the amount of CO2 produced up front.
Sayles said he is confident that Rentech can produce liquid transportation fuels from coal at least as cleanly as current diesel production processes.
"Incentives like the voucher bill could be predicated on that kind of a standard, requiring that we be cleaner than the fuels we displace," Sayles said.
He hopes that whatever Congress decides to do about CTL, it creates certainty for investors.
"What the market dislikes most is uncertainty," he said.
Rentech Inc. Sees Economic Opportunity in Mingo County
Rentech Inc. is well into its validation and scoping phase of development of a coal-to-liquids plant in Mingo County.
"In the validation and scoping phase, one of our main charges was to verify that there was a carbon dioxide solution for the area," said Rentech financial analyst John S. Marr, who is part of the company's Mingo County development group.
The company is seeking ways to store the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, or CO2, that would be captured at the plant during the production of diesel fuel from coal.
"There's quite a bit of opportunity there with the Devonian shale that's in the Appalachian basin," he said. "CO2 can be sequestered (stored) in or below the Devonian shale."
Another possibility is enhanced coalbed methane recovery, he said, in which a company that is pumping coalbed methane from the ground would use CO2 from the Rentech plant to help push it out.
Neither of these uses of CO2 has been tried commercially, Marr said, although researchers at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) are studying sequestration in Devonian shale, and enhanced oil recovery is in use elsewhere.
Another aspect of this phase is to validate a customer base for the plant's diesel fuel.
The company has stated in the past that the likeliest market for its 20,000 barrels per day of diesel fuel is local coal companies, which use diesel already and might enter mutually beneficial purchase agreements for coal and diesel.
Other possible markets include area railroads and the West Virginia National Guard, Marr said.
Working with the Mingo County Redevelopment Authority, Rentech also is looking at other win-win arrangements.
The plant may "co-feed" West Virginia hardwoods for as much as 20 percent of the feedstock for the liquid fuel, Marr said, a process that would further reduce the plant's CO2 footprint.
And it may be able to use in its production process water that active coal companies currently pump from flooded mines.
Rentech has begun an economic impact study with Marshall University, Marr said, and will have specific numbers from that study by about the end of the year.
But the company has estimated in advance of that study that plant construction would employ as many as 2000 at its height, and that operation of the plant would employ about 250 permanently.
It would also create perhaps another 200 mining jobs, Marr said, for about 6 million tons of coal a year -- 4 percent of West Virginia's current coal production.
The soonest Marr sees the plant up and running is early 2012.
Copyright 2007 West Virginia Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Muß gleich weg...
Wenn die Amis direkt weiter ins grüne Laufen, gar im grünen schließen, dann is die Euphorieeee perfekt...
HAHA SWay ist nicht da... der wird Augen machen!!!
Optionen
| Boardmail an "tornadotoni" |
Wertpapier: Silverado Gold Mines |
Angehängte Grafik:
chart.png (verkleinert auf 81%)
chart.png (verkleinert auf 81%)
ein verspätetes reagieren auf die letzten news ?
der Beginn eines "naked" Shortsquezze ? (c) by Sway ?
ein buy on bad news ?
Insider ? Bullenfalle ?
eine normale, technische Korrektur ?
eine Bullenüberreaktion ?
Wenn heute keine Antwort kommt sind wir bestimmt in null,nix wieder runter.
Welcher Experte hat eine Erklärung, Vermutung ?
Ist melus 7124 posting plausibel ?
Also Silverado steckt voller Rätsel. Ein wahres Überraschungsei für mich. Ich hoffe nur, dass der Spaß gestern kein kurzweiliger ist.
Spannung ist jedenfalls für heute garantiert.
Nolan Creek Lode Gold Exploration Picks Up
EXPLORATION DRILLING STARTED - MORE TRENCHING CONDUCTED
SILVERADO - OTCBB: SLGLF/Frankfurt: SLGL/Berlin: SLGL
FAIRBANKS, AK and VANCOUVER, Sept. 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ - Silverado Gold Mines announced today that it has begun exploration drilling on its Nolan property using the company's recently purchased diamond drill rig. The drilling focuses on an area North of Smith Creek: http://www.silverado.com/maps/060907overview.pdf, where company backhoe trenching previously identified three zones that contain gold-antimony bearing quartz vein systems (see press releases from July 16, 2007, January 29, 2007, January 22, 2007, July 16, 2007 and August 08, 2007). Drilling has begun on Zone 1: Figure 1: http://www.silverado.com/maps/060907fig1.pdf, where a continuous chip sample from Trench H, collected from a 16.4ft (5m) interval by Silverado geologists, yielded 5.22 troy ounces per ton gold and 8.74% antimony (see press release August 08, 2007). The core drilling program is designed to check for down-dip continuity of the gold-antimony bearing quartz vein systems in the three zones identified so far, which are part of the Solomon Shear system, and will help company geologists to obtain a better understanding of the nature of the mineralized systems.
In June and July 2007, Silverado Gold Mines conducted backhoe trenching on its Nolan Creek property, totaling 328m (1076.12ft), to further investigate the gold-antimony bearing quartz vein systems (see press release July 16, 2007 and August 08, 2007). Part of this first trenching program was the excavation of Trench I, which is located 60m (197ft) northeast of Trench H: Figure 1: http://www.silverado.com/maps/060907fig1.pdf - and extending over 192.5m (631.6ft). This trench exposes the three zones that contain the gold-antimony bearing quartz vein systems. A total of 86 combined select chip and continuous chip rock samples were collected during the trenching program and submitted to ALS Chemex in Fairbanks for analysis. Significant gold values were found in Trench I with results as high as 0.23 troy ounces gold per ton (7.84 g/t Au). The antimony values reached as high as 48.07% (see Table 1). These high antimony values are consistent with the previous work in this vicinity where sampling showed antimony assays as high as 46% (see press release January 29, 2007). 16 samples shown as greater than 1% are still being quantitatively assayed for total antimony.
Table 1: Trench I Assay results greater than 0.3 g/t Gold or 1% Antimony
TABLE 1
--------------------------------------------------
Trench I - 192.5m
--------------------------------------------------
Gold Gold troy Anti-
Sample Sample Sample Sample grams/tonne ounces/ mony
Number Interval Width Type (metric) short ton %
--------------------------------------------------
07I11 25-27.5m 2.5m Continuous 0.02 0.00 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I12 27.5-30m 2.5m Continuous 1.14 0.03 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I13 29-29m 1m Select chip 1.01 0.03 greater
than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I14 30-32.5m 2.5m Continuous 2.04 0.06 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I15 30.7-31.3m 0.6m Select chip 7.84 0.23 greater
than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I19 40-42.5m 2.5m Continuous 1.12 0.03 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I20 40.3-40.7m 0.4m Select chip 1.52 0.04 30.03
--------------------------------------------------
07I23 47.5-50m 2.5m Continuous 1.16 0.03 6.02
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I24 48-49.8m 1.8m Select chip 1.19 0.03 30.35
--------------------------------------------------
07I28 57.5-60m 2.5m Continuous 0.41 0.01 0.88
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I29 57.8-58m 0.2m Select chip 1.47 0.04 22.92
--------------------------------------------------
07I32 65-67.5m 2.5m Continuous 1.21 0.04 0.51
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I33 66.7-67.2m 0.5m Select chip 4.23 0.12 greater
than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I37 75-77.5m 2.5m Continuous 1.71 0.05 0.07
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I39 80-82.5m 2.5m Continuous 1.01 0.03 1.76
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I40 90-92.5m 2.5m Continuous 0.34 0.01 0.02
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I43 97.5-100m 2.5m Continuous 0.35 0.01 0.01
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I45 102.5-105m 2.5m Continuous 0.05 0.00 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I46 102.7-102.75 0.05m Select chip 1.78 0.05 greater
than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I49 110-112.5m 2.5m Continuous 1.16 0.03 0.00
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I50 112.3-112.31m 0.01m Select chip 5.08 0.15 0.03
--------------------------------------------------
07I58 130-132.5m 2.5m Continuous 0.30 0.01 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I59 130.5-130.55m 0.05m Select chip 0.65 0.02 48.07
--------------------------------------------------
07I60 132.5-135m 2.5m Continuous 0.97 0.03 0.01
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I61 134.1-134.4m 0.3m Select chip 5.86 0.17 0.01
--------------------------------------------------
07I65 142.5-145m 2.5m Continuous 0.24 0.01 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I66 144-144.08m 0.08m Select chip 0.40 0.01 greater
than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I72 157.5-160m 2.5m Continuous 0.41 0.01 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I73 159.97-160 0.03m Select chip 1.92 0.06 greater
than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I75 162.5-165m 2.5m Continuous 0.48 0.01 greater
chip than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I76 164.7-164.74m 0.04m Select chip 0.29 0.01 greater
than 1
--------------------------------------------------
07I77 165-167.5m 2.5m Continuous 0.37 0.01 0.08
chip
--------------------------------------------------
07I78 166-167m 1m Select chip 0.33 0.01 0.42
--------------------------------------------------
07I84 183-183.2 0.2m Select chip 1.49 0.04 0.01
--------------------------------------------------
07I86 190-192.5 2.5m Continuous 0.31 0.01 0.01
chip
--------------------------------------------------
In August 2007, Silverado geologists further investigated Trench H, which was sampled in July 2007 and yielded 5.22 troy ounces per ton gold and 8.74% antimony (Interval 10-15m) and 2.62% antimony (Interval 5-10m) (see press release August 08, 2007). These two intervals were the subject of re-sampling that resulted in 5 continuous chip samples (2m interval) and two select chip samples. All samples were submitted to ALS Chemex in Fairbanks for analysis. Assays are pending.
In addition to Silverado's first trenching campaign, the company undertook more backhoe trenching in August 2007, which resulted in the excavation of three more trenches across Zone 1: Figure 1: http://www.silverado.com/maps/060907fig1.pdf - totaling 105m (344.5ft). The purpose of this second trenching campaign was to test for the continuation of the gold-bearing antimony veins in Zone 1 along strike. A total of 35 combined select chip and continuous chip rock samples were collected during the trenching program and submitted to ALS Chemex in Fairbanks for analysis. Assays are pending.
A total of 989 soil samples were collected during the 2007 ground geochemical survey and have been sent to ALS Chemex in Fairbanks for analysis. The 417 samples analyzed to date show a distinct arsenic and antimony anomalous trend on the eastern part of the Solomon Shear trend. Arsenic anomalies are strong indicators for the presence of gold.
Along with the soil sampling campaign, Silverado Gold Mines conducted an extensive very low frequency - electromagnetic (VLF-EM) ground geophysical survey to identify structures such as shear zones, faults, and veins that occur within the bedrock. The coincident soil and geophysical anomalies indicate the likely presence of gold and antimony mineralization.
By the gold, arsenic and antimony soil anomalies; the structural trends identified by the VLF-EM surveys; the results of backhoe trenching; and structural geological field mapping, several potential drill targets in this area within the Solomon Shear trend have been identified. Exploration drilling will continue as long as weather permits.
The assay analysis turn-around time by ALS Chemex in Fairbanks is approximately 3-5 weeks.
This press release was prepared by Dr. Karsten Eden, Certified Professional Geologist, who is a qualified person as defined under the standards of Canadian National Instrument policy 43-101.
About Silverado:
Silverado is an international company focused on Gold and a new environmentally friendly Fuel Technology. Silverado has gold properties located throughout Alaska, which include the 100% owned Nolan Placer Gold Mine. Silverado is also entering the construction phase of an environmentally friendly low cost strategic fuel demonstration facility. Silverado's Green Fuel will be produced from low-rank coal and processed into an environmentally friendly oil substitute. Silverado Green Fuel Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of its publicly traded parent, Silverado Gold Mines Ltd. For more information about Silverado Green Fuel Inc., please visit http://www.silveradogreenfuel.com/ and the parent public corporation, http://www.silverado.com/.
This Press Release may contain, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are based on management's expectations and beliefs, and involve risks and uncertainties. These statements may involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to be materially different from the results implied herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements made in this Press Release.
CONTACT: SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD.: Mailing Address, 1820 - 1111 W. Georgia Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6E 4M3, CA, Toll Free: (800) 665-4646 or (604) 689-1535, Fax: (604) 682-3519, pr@silverado.com, http://www.silverado.com; Field Address, 3180 Peger Rd., Ste 270, Fairbanks, AK, 99709-5485, USA
SOURCE Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.
Nolan Creek Lode Gold Exploration Picks Up
Thursday September 6, 6:00 am ET
EXPLORATION DRILLING STARTED - MORE TRENCHING CONDUCTED
SILVERADO - OTCBB: SLGLF/Frankfurt: SLGL/Berlin: SLGL
FAIRBANKS, AK and VANCOUVER, Sept. 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ - Silverado Gold Mines announced today that it has begun exploration drilling on its Nolan property using the company's recently purchased diamond drill rig. The drilling focuses on an area North of Smith Creek: http://www.silverado.com/maps/060907overview.pdf, where company backhoe trenching previously identified three zones that contain gold-antimony bearing quartz vein systems (see press releases from July 16, 2007, January 29, 2007, January 22, 2007, July 16, 2007 and August 08, 2007). Drilling has begun on Zone 1: Figure 1: http://www.silverado.com/maps/060907fig1.pdf, where a continuous chip sample from Trench H, collected from a 16.4ft (5m) interval by Silverado geologists, yielded 5.22 troy ounces per ton gold and 8.74% antimony (see press release August 08, 2007). The core drilling program is designed to check for down-dip continuity of the gold-antimony bearing quartz vein systems in the three zones identified so far, which are part of the Solomon Shear system, and will help company geologists to obtain a better understanding of the nature of the mineralized systems. ........
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070906/to480.html?.v=27
- es wurden keine großen Brocken mehr geschmissen
- an der Energiefront tut sich was
ist sicher ne Melange aus mehreren Elementen ;-)
Gruß ka-el
Optionen
| Boardmail an "kleinlieschen" |
Wertpapier: Silverado Gold Mines |
Börse: NASDAQ OTC BB
Datum: 05.09.07
Tickliste Zeit
Kurs
Volumen§
21:59:07 0,0870 12500
21:59:05 0,0870 12500
21:58:43 0,0870 20000
21:57:23 0,0870 175000
21:55:35 0,0870 31000
21:53:19 0,0870 61000
21:52:34 0,0870 50000
21:52:30 0,0890 30000
21:51:32 0,0870 3000
21:50:23 0,0900 10000
21:48:15 0,0900 65000
21:48:11 0,0900 5000
21:47:33 0,0900 10000
21:39:47 0,0900 4154
21:39:47 0,0900 6900
21:39:11 0,0900 1350
21:38:48 0,0900 20000
21:38:27 0,0910 10000
21:37:26 0,0900 1550
21:36:46 0,0900 10000
21:36:46 0,0890 10000
21:36:44 0,0890 25000
21:36:09 0,0890 25000
21:36:09 0,0890 10000
21:36:09 0,0890 10000
21:35:58 0,0890 5000
21:35:46 0,0900 10000
21:35:38 0,0900 5000
21:35:32 0,0910 100085
21:35:20 0,0910 50000
21:35:13 0,0900 50000
21:35:08 0,0910 25000
21:35:08 0,0900 15000
21:35:08 0,0900 10000
21:35:03 0,0900 15000
21:34:44 0,0900 9200
21:34:41 0,0900 55000
21:34:41 0,0900 9200
21:34:33 0,0910 25000
21:33:53 0,0900 3500
21:33:40 0,0900 25000
21:32:17 0,0900 20000
21:32:07 0,0900 25000
21:31:34 0,0900 50000
21:31:16 0,0900 5000
21:31:12 0,0880 30000
21:31:11 0,0900 5000
21:31:04 0,0890 30000
21:31:01 0,0880 7000
21:31:01 0,0890 5000
21:30:59 0,0890 20000
21:29:30 0,0880 5000
21:29:20 0,0890 130000
21:29:11 0,0880 130000
21:25:53 0,0880 3500
21:24:25 0,0890 50000
21:23:24 0,0890 20000
21:22:28 0,0885 50000
21:21:30 0,0880 20000
21:21:09 0,0880 3500
21:20:46 0,0880 10000
21:20:40 0,0870 10000
21:20:40 0,0880 25000
21:19:35 0,0880 50000
21:18:58 0,0880 25000
21:18:47 0,0880 5000
21:18:30 0,0860 20000
21:18:22 0,0860 25000
21:18:05 0,0850 5000
21:17:57 0,0850 5150
21:17:55 0,0850 4907
21:17:55 0,0850 50000
21:17:47 0,0850 32700
21:17:42 0,0850 5000
21:17:32 0,0850 50000
21:17:16 0,0850 25000
21:17:08 0,0850 5000
21:17:03 0,0850 20000
21:16:54 0,0840 20000
21:16:54 0,0850 5000
21:16:18 0,0850 10000
21:15:58 0,0840 10000
21:11:33 0,0850 25000
21:11:15 0,0840 50000
21:10:10 0,0850 25000
21:10:09 0,0840 25000
21:06:43 0,0850 16000
21:06:25 0,0840 16000
21:05:31 0,0849 5000
21:04:21 0,0849 40000
21:04:21 0,0849 50000
21:03:44 0,0840 5000
21:03:04 0,0810 5000
21:02:35 0,0810 5000
21:01:50 0,0810 50000
21:00:16 0,0810 1000
20:58:55 0,0800 2300
20:58:55 0,0800 4000
20:58:55 0,0810 10000
20:57:43 0,0800 10000
20:57:00 0,0800 10000
20:56:52 0,0800 5000
20:56:38 0,0800 50000
20:55:22 0,0800 50000
20:55:02 0,0800 5000
20:54:38 0,0800 30000
20:54:23 0,0800 37500
20:54:04 0,0800 5000
20:53:52 0,0800 5000
20:53:37 0,0790 5000
20:53:35 0,0790 15000
20:53:29 0,0790 25000
20:53:24 0,0780 67000
20:53:06 0,0790 5000
20:53:04 0,0780 30000
20:52:54 0,0780 2000
20:52:44 0,0790 2500
20:52:37 0,0780 20000
20:52:14 0,0780 25000
20:51:59 0,0780 20000
20:51:52 0,0780 2500
20:51:38 0,0780 10000
20:51:38 0,0780 21300
20:51:38 0,0780 28000
20:51:36 0,0780 50000
20:51:30 0,0776 12000
20:51:30 0,0780 25000
20:49:53 0,0780 2500
20:46:11 0,0770 1000
20:45:54 0,0780 20000
20:45:41 0,0770 19000
20:42:00 0,0780 25000
20:41:48 0,0770 25000
20:41:19 0,0780 15000
20:40:40 0,0780 15000
20:40:34 0,0776 15000
20:40:34 0,0780 15000
20:35:37 0,0780 10000
20:34:34 0,0780 197500
20:34:17 0,0770 197600
20:34:01 0,0695 200000
20:33:56 0,0780 30000
20:33:36 0,0770 30000
20:18:06 0,0780 25000
20:18:00 0,0770 50000
20:17:13 0,0770 30000
20:17:12 0,0770 25000
20:16:50 0,0770 50000
20:16:46 0,0770 50000
20:13:01 0,0770 5000
20:09:50 0,0770 50000
20:08:34 0,0770 22500
20:07:06 0,0770 17500
20:02:51 0,0770 10000
20:01:32 0,0770 10000
19:55:03 0,0760 1000
19:52:10 0,0770 80000
19:52:01 0,0760 6500
19:51:49 0,0760 80000
19:51:37 0,0760 13500
19:42:54 0,0770 5000
19:42:54 0,0760 28000
19:42:39 0,0750 5000
19:42:18 0,0750 100000
19:41:57 0,0750 2900
19:40:48 0,0750 5000
19:40:48 0,0750 5000
19:40:30 0,0750 5000
19:40:21 0,0750 25000
19:40:15 0,0750 5000
19:40:13 0,0750 5000
19:40:08 0,0750 25000
19:38:24 0,0740 100000
19:37:36 0,0750 50000
19:36:55 0,0750 5000
19:36:43 0,0750 20000
19:36:41 0,0750 7100
19:36:37 0,0750 50000
19:36:26 0,0750 10000
19:36:23 0,0750 35000
19:36:17 0,0750 5000
19:36:08 0,0750 50000
19:35:55 0,0744 20000
19:34:43 0,0740 10000
19:34:19 0,0740 10000
19:34:15 0,0740 9000
19:31:32 0,0730 50000
19:31:29 0,0730 50000
19:31:23 0,0730 45000
19:31:17 0,0730 50000
19:30:26 0,0720 10000
19:29:32 0,0720 10000
19:29:31 0,0720 100000
19:29:31 0,0720 5000
19:29:26 0,0720 46500
19:29:25 0,0720 10000
19:29:19 0,0720 100000
18:46:34 0,0700 40000
18:46:21 0,0700 10000
18:46:16 0,0700 10000
18:43:29 0,0700 15000
18:40:30 0,0710 40000
18:40:28 0,0710 5000
18:40:05 0,0710 5000
18:03:37 0,0710 2000
18:01:48 0,0720 15000
17:35:18 0,0710 40000
17:34:53 0,0710 50000
17:34:47 0,0710 95000
17:34:10 0,0710 80000
17:31:51 0,0710 50000
17:31:44 0,0710 50000
17:31:31 0,0710 50000
17:31:23 0,0710 50000
17:25:09 0,0710 5000
17:09:23 0,0710 10000
17:08:52 0,0710 18000
17:06:31 0,0710 4554
16:52:20 0,0720 100000
16:52:17 0,0710 100000
16:50:00 0,0720 50000
16:50:00 0,0710 50000
16:49:04 0,0720 50000
16:48:59 0,0710 50000
16:26:24 0,0710 10000
16:26:11 0,0720 1000
16:17:39 0,0720 100000
16:17:31 0,0710 100000
16:15:42 0,0710 25000
16:15:39 0,0710 25000
16:15:27 0,0710 10000
16:13:41 0,0700 156861
16:10:56 0,0710 12000
16:10:46 0,0700 12000
16:09:45 0,0710 5000
16:06:00 0,0710 50000
16:05:51 0,0700 50000
16:05:25 0,0700 20000
15:57:16 0,0710 200000
15:57:07 0,0700 200000
15:56:48 0,0700 2000
15:56:35 0,0700 250000
15:55:12 0,0700 5000
15:54:27 0,0700 50000
15:54:07 0,0700 50000
15:54:04 0,0700 50000
15:53:13 0,0700 50000
15:53:08 0,0700 50000
15:53:01 0,0700 50000
15:52:51 0,0700 5000
15:51:57 0,0700 5000
15:47:32 0,0690 50000
15:46:55 0,0690 1298
15:46:30 0,0700 30000
15:46:25 0,0690 30000
15:44:22 0,0700 10000
15:41:25 0,0700 550
15:37:56 0,0700 6500
15:37:53 0,0700 50000
15:36:26 0,0700 100000
15:34:08 0,0700 47680
15:34:03 0,0700 940
15:33:51 0,0700 25000
15:33:26 0,0700 25000
15:33:11 0,0700 50000
15:32:58 0,0710 33000
15:31:03 0,0710 10000
15:30:46 0,0710 4999
15:30:27 0,0710 2500
15:30:18 0,0700 20000
15:30:11 0,0700 0
15:30:11 0,0700 3000
Hinweis: Angaben in grüner Schrift zeigen, dass der Kurs im Vergleich zum vorigen Kurs gestiegen ist, Angaben in roter Schrift zeigen gefallene Kurse.
Optionen
| Boardmail an "18prozent" |
Wertpapier: Silverado Gold Mines |
Metals - Gold hits year high above 697 usd on fund buying, strong demand ....
http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/.../06/afx4089544.html
für meinen Geschmack bin ich nicht ganz zufrieden!
der auch steigende € zerstört unseren Gewinn!
wir haben im roten Bereich geschlossen!
Volumen naja!
Indis sehen alle verdammt stark aus allein der MACD hat soviel potenzial RRrrrrrrrrrr,
Der 25 Wochenzyklus war bisher "fakt" seit 2006! das kann und darf sich auch ganz schnell ändern...
Ich kann mich nur wiederholen, der der investiert ist soll froh sein!!!!!!!!!!!!
Optionen
| Boardmail an "tornadotoni" |
Wertpapier: Silverado Gold Mines |
Angehängte Grafik:
chart.png (verkleinert auf 60%)
chart.png (verkleinert auf 60%)
Gruß ka-el
______________________________________________
Von Nix ne Ahnung, aber zu Allem ne Meinung :-)
Optionen
| Boardmail an "kleinlieschen" |
Wertpapier: Silverado Gold Mines |