silverado goldmines (867737)
denke nicht das der trend nach unten gebrochen ist
hab es auch nicht ausgehalten: vor paar tagen die hälfte verkauft bei meinem durschnittlichen einkaufskurs von 6,2 cent
weiss daher nicht ob ich mich jetzt über die 10 prozent plus ärgern oder freuen soll
fest steht: die andere hälfte bleibt drinnen, egal was kommt
daher: STAY LONG
schöne grüsse 18 prozent
stay long
So long
Da am WE keine news kamen, war das am Freitag wohl nur ein Rebound wie im Mai.
Für Ängstliche noch mal die Chance schnell etwas besser rauszukommen.
Für rosa Brillenträger egal, denn der Dollar kommt. ;-)
eine schöne Woche allesamt.
Nicht vor lauter Green Fuel das Gold vergessen... ;)
In Alaska ist nämlich doch Gold was glänzt.
solong
By: wysongcj
03 Jul 2007, 01:21
Okay... I've invested into this company regardless of the pros/cons. It is certainly a gamble at this point. I figure it is better than a casino or lottery tickets though.
Silverado's 10 year average is at around .41/share. If, in the next year, there is an increase to anywhere near the average... then, great! If not, it surely will at some point be above my current average mark again.
Regardless of how desperate Mississippi is or what the past history of the company is... I see positive current information more so than negative current information due to blurbs here and there from outside sources.
I don't think I believe to much into the bashing / short selling theories... it seems way to organized, etc... I don't really know why some are so adamant about ensuring people know the bad and why others are so adamant about ensuring people know the good. In either case, there isn't a need to get emotional about it because if it isn't your money, "Who cares!?" I just don't buy into either.
What I did buy is a total of 134,948 shares at an average of $0.0856 with no margin on which to worry. I'm expecting another buying opportunity before their fiscal year starts up again. I hope to take advantage of this period of time (summer slumps) and double my current number of shares by November. I'll keep most of this for up to 5 years; however, I'll look at everything again in 12 months to see what the news has to say, trends and current rates per share, etc.
Sure, this means a little luck and hope for being right; however, something is certainly coming up in regards to the Mississippi arrangements, political needs, Department of Energy reports, the price of Gold and the price of the dollar.
I'm sick in wondering and simply might as well just jump on board and hope for a return above the .10 per share rate. If it sinks, at least I can swim! :-)
If it hits the amazing $1/share... YAY! Anythig higher is just really freaking cool! Anything up close to that of SASOL is just something which will make my head spin and gain a perma-smile!
I'll just have to see and hope...
Thank you! ;-)
~Chris
(Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Hold)
Gemini Explorations Inc. Reports Illegal Naked Short Interest Position and Restates Total Number of Issued and Outstanding Shares Reduced to 32,500,000
2007-06-07 12:10 ET - News Release
MIAMI, FL -- (MARKETWIRE) -- 06/07/07
Gemini Explorations Inc. ("Gemini") (OTCBB: GMXP) reports that after reviewing the company's stock with an independent analyst, there is an illegal naked short interest position of approximately 3.5 to 4 million shares in GMXP. This is in very sharp contrast to the OTCBB.com report showing the short interest to be 23,972 shares as of May 31, 2007.
NASD Rule 3360 has been expanded to require NASD member firms to report their short positions on all over-the counter ("OTC") equity securities to NASD Regulation, on a monthly basis. Once the short position reports are received, the short interest is then compiled for each OTC security.
Firms are required to report their short positions as of settlement on the 15th of each month, or the preceding business day if the 15th is not a business day. The reports must be filed by the second business day after the reporting settlement date. The short interest data is compiled and provided for publication on the 8th business day after the reporting settlement date.
http://jsmineset.com/
So there I was looking around on the internet and today I find myself quoted! How bizaarre is that!?!?
More so interesting, my German has gotten really bad over the years. I used to live in Frankfurt for about 5 years about 10 years ago. I was pretty pleased with my ability to speak German. I bet I would just sound like a retard now though! LOL
Anyway... I don't know if it is a compliment or not to find myself quoted above from another board.
Why on earth is my post so important to quote out of curiosity?????????
Sincerely,
Chris
aka
"wysongcj"
und keine Sorge, der Broker in Frankfurt ist weder betrunken noch hat er einen anderen Umrechnungskurs als wir aber er will halt nicht das einer zu schnell verkauft. ;)
drücke den Kurs mit 30000st. auf 0,07€
Aber was sollen die auch machen bei dem geringen handelsniveau in Germany!
Aber die Amis werden es schon machen, in welche richtung bleibt abzuwarten!
Eine divergenz im MACD ist zu sehen ein kleiner hinweiß für eine Trendwende?
Schlußkurs > 0,098$ positiv
Schlußkurs kleiner 0,080$ negativ
An Apollo Program for Climate Change
Source: Washington Post
[Jul 04, 2007]
SYNOPSIS: MidAmerican Energy chairman and CEO David Sokol urges increased Federal funding for research, while John Kerry responds by criticizing utility industry for its own cuts in funding despite record profits.
§
a d v e r t i s e r
b u r s t
In May 1961, President John F. Kennedy committed the nation, by the end of that decade, to landing Americans on the moon and bringing them safely back to Earth. Kennedy identified specific interim goals, such as developing a lunar spacecraft, new rocket booster technologies, and the deployment of satellite communication and weather observation systems.
In asking Congress to support his goal, he said that the effort "will last for many years and carry very heavy costs" and that it demanded "a major national commitment of scientific and technical manpower."
Today, many political leaders say that climate change is the defining challenge of our generation. Unfortunately, they fail to provide Kennedy's understanding of what is required, much less the resources and leadership, to succeed.
The race in Congress and several states to adopt aggressive cap-and-trade emissions-reduction mandates is disconnected from the reality of our country's electricity supply and the state of technology for reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
More than 50 percent of our nation's electricity is derived from coal, and 20 percent comes from nuclear power. Natural gas generates roughly 17 percent of our electricity; hydropower, 7 percent; non-hydro renewables, 1.6 percent; and small fossil fuel units the remainder.
Each of these fuel sources possesses environmental and economic strengths and weaknesses. Coal has held a dominant role because it is abundantly available domestically, it's cheap, the price is relatively stable, and it is ideally suited to constant power generation.
The problem is that coal creates large amounts of carbon dioxide when it's burned. The industry has reduced other emissions, including sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide. But we don't have readily available technologies to remove carbon dioxide.
Yet shutting down U.S. coal plants is unthinkable in the near term and would have devastating consequences for the reliability and cost of our electric grid. As it is, electricity demand grows about 1.7 percent annually, and new supply significantly lags this growth.
Renewable energy, such as wind power, is experiencing huge growth, and energy-efficiency measures are helping to slow demand. But these initiatives cannot come close to offsetting our reliance on coal.
Placing caps on carbon emissions before the technology is available to actually reduce those emissions will simply impose a tax on the American people without any positive environmental benefits. There has to be a better way.
What's needed is a joint effort from the power sector, customers and the environmental community to push Congress and the Bush administration to live up to their rhetoric on clean coal, renewables, new nuclear power and efficiency programs.
Federal research and development funding for energy has declined 85 percent since the early 1980s, and efforts to fund the initiatives authorized in the 2005 Energy Policy Act have been sporadic at best. The $7 billion to $9 billion that President Kennedy sought for the space program in 1961 would be the equivalent of $46 billion to $60 billion today. By contrast, the Energy Department's annual civilian R&D budget is barely $2 billion.
The first priority for any program to reduce carbon is establishing a long-term, public-private funding partnership to research, develop and deploy emissions-reduction technologies into the market.
This effort could be financed through a small fee (one-twentieth of a cent) applied to every kilowatt of energy sold in the United States. Combined with matching federal funds, this could provide about $4 billion annually -- enough, experts believe, to develop the technology to reduce emissions 25 percent below 2000 levels by the year 2030, with dramatic reductions thereafter.
Besides finding new ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, we need to do research to achieve breakthroughs in renewable energy, nuclear technologies and reductions in demand, as well as improvements in high-voltage transmission systems and the retrofitting of existing fossil-fuel plants. Achieving a future of low carbon emissions is not a matter of choosing one technology over another. All must play a role.
Rather than simply passing emissions caps and hoping for the best, Congress should develop a comprehensive package of technology investment, renewable energy and energy efficiency mandates, tax incentives, and policy changes to reduce carbon emissions in the near and long term.
It is possible to create an economically sustainable low-carbon future by investing in technology now and deploying these technologies worldwide.
We need to start today, with the Kennedyesque goal of making the transition from 250 years of carbon-intensive growth to a low-carbon future in the next 25 years.
That's an ambitious but achievable goal that all Americans should be able to support.
The writer is chairman and chief executive of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. MidAmerican is 85 percent-owned by Berkshire Hathaway, whose chairman, Warren E. Buffett, is on the Washington Post Co.'s board of directors.
Senator John Kerry's Response
In his June 22 op-ed, "An Apollo Program for Climate Change," David Sokol, the chief executive of a major electric utility, rightly invoked the vision of President John F. Kennedy in calling for an ambitious program to fight climate change. But he wrongly argued that American taxpayers alone should have to dig into their pockets (through a per-kilowatt fee that utilities would no doubt pass along to consumers, plus federal matching funds) for what utility companies should already be doing with record profits -- investing in clean energy and research and development.
It's dishonest for energy companies to complain about low levels of public funding for R&D when the industry's own contributions toward such research have sunk to historic lows even as profits have soared. Private investment in research is lower than it was in 1975.
The bipartisan energy bill passed in the Senate makes important strides. But industry opposition killed two important proposals -- a renewable-electricity standard and tax incentives for low-carbon energy production -- that would have pushed us even closer to a responsible energy future. Many members of Congress on both sides of the aisle are committed to a bold policy for energy independence. Shouldn't the industry do its part?
Es gibt sie und sie sind unter uns und sie werden bald gegrillt.
auf den stock Seiten steht ja überall "sell", das wird dann erst recht noch bestätigt wenn die 50TageLinie die 200TageLinie kreuzt!
Aber stabiler als vor einem Jahr sind wir schon, sieht man ja deutlich!
der MACD steigt bei fallendem Kurs! Verläuft er knapp unter null und der bruch der 50TageLinie "blau" folgt dann darf es wieder grün werden, aber bis dahin müßen hier noch alle leiden und wohl nen langen Atem haben!
ABER PASSEN ERNEUTE TIEFEN VON 0,05$ Überhaupt noch ins Bild, bei der ??? Story ???
Habe ja noch 20K, aber auch wenn ich keine einzige hätte würde ich bei täglicher verfügbarkeit auf den Kurs schielen nur um zu sehen was nun wirklich mal eintreffen wird...
ps. Ab 0,07$ fange ich wieder erneut an man Depot mit Silv. aufzufüllen! den die 50% Gewinn sind immer wieder drin
das die 50er an der 200er abgleitet.
unabhängig vom history chart.
unabhängig der USA von ÖLimporten
unabhängig von den shortsellern.
unabhängig vom Goldmarkt
unabhängig vom Gesammtmarkt.
unabhängig vom Ölmarkt.
unabhängig von Patenten.
würden das ganze Chartgedöns überflüssig machen. :-)
Schönes Wochenende an alle.
Ich lege mich jetzt schlafen und träume bis Montag von Goldadern und Kursvervielfachung. ;-)
Oh was für ein süßer Traum. Schnell noch mal hinlegen und weiterträumen. :-)
auf einmal waren es 15 Eurocent.
Wollte verkaufen, aber bezwang meine Gier und Silverado stieg und stieg
von 15 auf 16, 17, 18, usw. alles an einem Tag und schließlich gelangten wir bei 0,30 Eurocent an.
Man ich bin reich dachte ich mir, hab nur das steigen beobachtet.
aber dann rechnete ich nach 400` x 0,30E sind erst 1,2 mill.
und dann wachte ich auf, dachte mir, wenn ich davon traüme kann der Start des Aufstiegs nicht mehr ferne sein.
GrünHorn seltsam, das du auch von Silverado geträumt hast !!!
auf einen guten wochenstart LB.