Neomedia: Fakten, Chancen und Risiken
Seite 190 von 245 Neuester Beitrag: 04.11.21 19:27 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 11.05.12 13:19 | von: menschmaier | Anzahl Beiträge: | 7.12 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 04.11.21 19:27 | von: iDonk | Leser gesamt: | 939.723 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 111 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 188 | 189 | | 191 | 192 | ... 245 > |
"Revisions to 2013 Interim Reporting – In connection with the completion of our third quarter 2013 and first quarter 2014 reporting, we identified certain errors associated with our first quarter 2013 interim reporting. We assessed the impact of these errors and concluded that the errors did not result in a material misstatement. To correct the errors, we have revised the three months ended March 31, 2013 reporting as discussed below. Our assessment considered the guidance provided by ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections and ASC Topic 250-10-S99-1, Assessing Materiality . Based on our conclusion that the errors were not material individually or in aggregate to any of the prior reporting periods, we determined amendments to previously filed financial statement reports were not required in accordance with the applicable ASC guidance. We also concluded that the revisions applicable to prior periods should be reflected herein and will be reflected in future filings containing such information.
The condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 originally reported a loss from change in fair value of hybrid financial instruments of $299,000 but should have reflected a gain of $6,774,000. Additionally, the Company reported a gain from change in fair value of derivative liability – Series C and D Convertible Preferred Stock and debentures of $6,774,000 but should have reflected a loss of $299,000. The errors were due to clerical transposing of the amounts and have been revised herein to reflect the proper amounts. The foreign currency translation adjustment within comprehensive income (loss) originally reflected a $111,000 loss but should have reflected a $111,000 gain. The reporting has been revised herein to reflect the proper amounts. Additionally, the fully diluted net income per share was reflected as $0.003 but should have been $0.000. The reporting has been revised herein to reflect the proper amount."
Was sagen denn die offiziellen Vertreter der Gesellschaft dazu?
Knete bezahlt haben.
Wundert das keinen?
Für eine Firma die kaum Umsatz macht!!!
Wo steht dann der Kurs?
Oder hat man was anderes vor?
Interessant war auch der Sprung von der 0,0004 direkt auf die 0,0006 heute kurz nach 20 Uhr.
Sehr verdächtig...