Universal Express (920232) STRONG BUY!


Seite 9 von 80
Neuester Beitrag: 14.03.05 17:37
Eröffnet am:13.10.03 14:44von: HiGhLiFEAnzahl Beiträge:2.994
Neuester Beitrag:14.03.05 17:37von: gindantsLeser gesamt:107.388
Forum:Hot-Stocks Leser heute:58
Bewertet mit:


 
Seite: < 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | ... 80  >  

194 Postings, 7711 Tage Lenny71OTC

 
  
    #201
22.10.03 16:20
Wie ist denn das, wenn der Kurs von der OTC zur NYSE wechselt, wie wirkt sich das auf die eigenen Aktien aus. Wird der Wert und die Anzahl der Aktien übernommen?  

8970 Postings, 7732 Tage bammie@Sam76

 
  
    #202
22.10.03 16:21
klar die news sind auch top, keine Frage

allerdings sehen die amis das wohl anners :(  

3096 Postings, 7762 Tage HiGhLiFE@Ca. Gouverneur

 
  
    #203
22.10.03 16:29
Ich bin momentan 4 OTC´s drin.
Es dürfte hier aber jedem der meine Postings liest aufgefallen sein, dass
ich dieses Forum nur für OTC´s benutze, da hier solchen Werten viel
mehr Beachtung geschenkt wird als Beispielsweise Standartwerten.
Falls es dich interessiert: ich bin derzeit in CYPT, FRLK, NEOM und USXP.
Also ich bin NICHT überall drin.  

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67Drüben bleiben sie locker und finden alles normal

 
  
    #204
22.10.03 19:53
Looking at USXP's daily chart;

We had an up day with a gap and a new high with a 120 million shares traded followed by three much lower volume down days where we filled the gap and each day the volume was lower than the previous one. then we had 2 up days and again the volume was high 80+ million and 70+ million and now we have two down days so far and again the volume is much lower and decreasing day after day. We are still riding our 13 day EMA and we are forming a pennant in the process.

IMO you all need to relax its still bullish and performing normally.

Good luck to all.
 

3096 Postings, 7762 Tage HiGhLiFE@joker67

 
  
    #205
22.10.03 20:34
Es is ja auch Nachrichtenmässig nix passiert, deshalb gibs auch
überhaupt keinen Grund zur Panik.
Ganz im Gegenteil, bin ziemlich sicher das es bei den nächsten
News wieder steil nach oben geht.
 

10529 Postings, 8000 Tage big lebowskySo,jetzt machen wir einfach nichts.

 
  
    #206
22.10.03 20:37
Wenn wir an den Wert glauben,dann kaufen wir bei 0.05-0.06 nach und dann durch--so oder so...  

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67Ich glaube an den Wert , dafür wird auch unter den

 
  
    #207
22.10.03 20:51
bashern in anderen foren zuviel bambule gemacht,als da nicht noch was kommen müsste.
Also Daumen hoch Jungs und Augen zu.  

3096 Postings, 7762 Tage HiGhLiFEDonnerstag Kursfeuerwerk???

 
  
    #208
22.10.03 22:42
Nun, die Kongresssitzung mit der Rede von Altomare is gelaufen.
Zwischen den Zeilen, konnte man ein positves Feedback erfahren.
In einer Pressmitteilung hat Präsident Bush sich positiv gegenüber den
Plänen geäussert den Airlines mehr Sicherheit , Kosteneinsparungen etc.
zu ermöglichen. Altomare hat zu der ganzen Geschichte sehr sinnvolle
Pläne, wer die gelesen hat, wirds bestätigen.
Dann heute das Meeting der SEC an dem ebenfalls Altomare mitteilgenommen hat.
Was heißt mitteilgenommen?
Er hat den Wagen zum Thema NAKED-SHORT-SELLING erst ins Rollen gebracht,
nachdem er in vielen Interviews und persönlich bei der SEC die
Regelungen an der OTC kritisiert hat.
Wir sollten bedenken, dass zwei Gerichte in Florida USXP über 500 Mio$
Schadensersatz zugesprochen haben, die ja dúrch das besagte
Naked-Short-Selling entstanden sind.
Insgesamt bin ich sehr positiv gestimmt, dass wir eventuell morgen
eine Topmeldung zu den Ereignissen der letzten beiden Tage erhalten
und das das dem Kurs den nötigen Auftrieb geben wird.

Gruß
 

1433 Postings, 7872 Tage joviGuten Morgen erstmal

 
  
    #209
23.10.03 07:52
wäre wohl jemand so freundlich und geht mal zu  www.sec.gov  und interpretiert den neuesten Bericht über die gestrige Sitzung und über "naked short selling"...
Leider kann ich diese "Behörden-Amerikanisch" nicht richtig deuten und bevor ich hier was falsches sage bitte ich erstmal um eure Hilfe..DANKE

Jovi  

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67Morgen an Alle usxpler

 
  
    #210
23.10.03 10:09
@jovi meinst Du diesen "einfachen"*g* Bericht?
Ich glaube da brauche ich auch (wenn überhaupt) etwas länger!!!

SEC Proposes Fund Subadviser and Short Sale Rules; Adopts Changes to Rule 10b-18
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2003-140
Washington, D.C., Oct. 22, 2003 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today voted to propose a new rule and rule amendments concerning shareholder approval of subadvisory arrangements at investment companies; to amend Rule 10b-18 and related disclosure regulations; to propose new rules and rule amendments and issue an interpretive release dealing with regulation of short sales.

The Commission decided to propose new Rule 15a-5 under the Investment Company Act and amendments to Form N-1A under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act. The amendments would allow an investment adviser to serve as a subadviser to an investment company (fund) without shareholder approval, under certain conditions.

The Investment Company Act prohibits an investment adviser from serving a fund unless the fund's shareholders have voted to approve the adviser. In the past ten years, many funds have begun to operate as "manager of managers" funds, in which the principal investment adviser does not directly manage the fund's portfolio investments, but instead hires and supervises other investment advisers (i.e., subadvisers) to manage the fund's investments.

In a manager of managers fund, the principal adviser changes subadvisers based on their performance, much as a fund's investment adviser changes its portfolio manager employees based on their performance. The ability to hire and fire subadvisers without the delay and expense of a shareholder vote benefits shareholders by allowing the fund to quickly terminate a poorly performing subadviser and hire another. Therefore, the Commission has issued exemptive orders to funds that have sought to operate in this way, and the proposed amendments would make this relief available to all manager of managers funds.

The rule amendments the Commission is proposing would exempt funds from the shareholder vote requirement if

hiring the subadviser would not increase management fees paid by shareholders;
 
the subadviser has an arm's length relationship with the principal adviser (i.e., it is not affiliated, except that a wholly-owned subsidiary of the principal adviser can be replaced by another wholly-owned subsidiary);
 
shareholders of the fund have authorized the fund to operate as a "manager of managers" fund; and
 
within 90 days after hiring a new subadviser, the fund notifies shareholders of the change.
A manager of managers fund would also be required to disclose in its prospectus that the principal adviser can retain and discharge subadvisers without shareholder approval, subject to board approval.

Comments on the proposed rule amendments will be due by Jan. 8, 2004.

The Commission also voted to adopt amendments to Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Rule 10b-18 provides issuers with a safe harbor from liability for manipulation if they repurchase their common stock in the open market in accordance with the rule's manner, time, price, and volume conditions. The amendments will update the rule's provisions to reflect market developments since the rule's adoption including

easing the timing condition to allow issuers that meet an average daily trading volume and public float test to stay in the market longer and qualify for the safe harbor;
 
extending the safe harbor to certain after-hours repurchases;
 
amending the pricing condition to apply a uniform price limit for all issuers;
 
increasing the volume limitation to 100% of average daily trading volume following a market-wide suspension;
 
modifying the block exception to include block repurchases in applying the 25% average daily trading volume limitation, or alternatively, to purchase one block per week; and
 
stating the scope of safe harbor eligibility with respect to mergers, acquisitions and similar transactions.
To enhance the transparency of issuer repurchases, the Commission voted to adopt amendments to Regulations S-K and S-B, Exchange Act Forms 10-Q, 10-K, 10-QSB, 10-KSB, 20-F, and Form N-CSR under the Exchange Act and Investment Company Act of 1940 to require periodic disclosure of all issuer repurchases of equity securities, regardless of whether the repurchases are effected in accordance with Rule 10b-18. The amendments will require issuers to disclose, among other things, the total number of shares repurchased, the average price paid per share, and the number of shares repurchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program.

These provisions will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Finally, the Commission voted to propose new short sale regulation under Regulation SHO, which would modernize and replace Rules 3b-3, 10a-1, and 10a-2 under the Exchange Act. Regulation SHO would include the following.

A uniform short sale price test, Rule 201, applicable to exchange-listed and Nasdaq NMS securities, wherever traded, that would restrict all short sales to a price above the consolidated best bid
 
Proposed Rule 201 would incorporate some exceptions in current Rule 10a-1, and include additional exceptions to address situations involving locked and crossed markets, short sales executed at a volume weighted average price, broker-dealer executions of customer "long" sales on a riskless principal basis, and short sales by broker-dealers to fill customer limit buy orders as required by the federal securities laws or rules of the self-regulatory organizations.

A temporary Rule 202(T) that would suspend, on a two-year pilot basis, the operation of the proposed bid test of Rule 201 for a select group of liquid securities
 
New "locate" and delivery requirements under proposed Rule 203 to address abusive so-called naked short selling
 
Rule 203 would incorporate provisions of the existing SRO "locate" rules into a uniform Commission rule applicable to all equity securities, wherever they are traded.
 
Rule 203 would also impose additional requirements on securities that have a substantial amount of failures to deliver.

Rule 200 of Regulation SHO, which would define the term "short sale" to allow multi-service broker-dealers to aggregate their positions by separate trading units; and modify the definition of ownership of a security to address security futures products and unconditional contracts to purchase securities.
The Commission also voted to

propose amendments to Rule 105 of Regulation M (short selling prior to a public offering) to eliminate the shelf offering exception; and
 
issue an interpretive release providing all market participants with guidance regarding the use of "married put" transactions when aggregating positions under current Rule 3b-3 for determining compliance with current Rule 10a-1 and Rule 105 of Regulation M. A "married put" is the purchase of an option to sell (i.e., a put option) a certain number of securities at a particular price by a specified time, bought contemporaneously with the same number of underlying securities.
The Commission will solicit comment on the proposals for a period of 60 days following their publication in the Federal Register.

The full text of detailed releases concerning each of these items will be posted to the SEC Web site as soon as possible.

 

http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2003-140.htm


 

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67Nach der Einschätzung stehen ein paar Indikatoren

 
  
    #211
23.10.03 10:23
bereits auf bullish/very bullish.
Dann bin ich mal gespannt.

StockTA.com
Stock Technical Analysis
Home Analysis Screen Picks Charts Markets School
Analysis Chart Fibs Level II Opinion News Fund.(y) Fund (cs) Analysts 5min Chart Quote Options Insiders
Symbol help USXP Analysis
Markets Overview Market Momentum Market Indices Isdex Index Nasdaq 100 Dow 30 Commodities 52 Week Highs 52 Week Lows Volume Leaders Price Advances Price Declines Percent Advances Percent Declines
USXP Universal Express, Inc.

Symbol Last Trade Date Change Open High Low Volume
USXP 0.092 Oct-22-2003 -0.01 0.1 0.1 0.087 15,444,500
Note: Canadian symbols now end in .c i.e SYMB.C Overall Short Intermediate Long
Analysis Bullish Neutral Bullish Very Bullish
Support/Resistance
Type Value Conf.
resist. 0.13 2
resist. 0.12 4
resist. 0.10 3
supp 0.09 4
supp 0.08 6
supp 0.07 3
supp 0.06 3
supp 0.05 4
supp 0.05 2
supp 0.04 4
supp 0.04 2
supp 0.03 4
supp 0.02 10





Chart Indicators
Ind. short Inter Long
EMA VBu VBu VBu
MACD VBu VBu VBu
RSI . Bu .
TDD . Be .
Fibs Be Be Bu
Highs N N VBu
Lows N Bu VBu
Trends N N N
Stochastic Be . .
VBu=Very Bullish, Bu=Bullish
N=Neutral
Be=Bearish, VBe=Very Bearish
 

2676 Postings, 7770 Tage sam76Das was im Busch ist

 
  
    #212
23.10.03 10:29
das muss jedem doch klar sein, die Aktie ist um 40% angestiegen und hält diese auch und das jetzt schon ein paar tage. Wenn da jetzt noch ein Auftrag kommt dann hat preisfuchs wieder alles richtig gemacht. Wir natürlich auch!
Mal schauen was der heutige Tag so bringt.
gruss sam  

1433 Postings, 7872 Tage joviYep Joker

 
  
    #213
23.10.03 10:29
den meinte ich :)))

kann das denn keiner verständlich in Kölsch ausdrücken..ÄH deutsch natürlich :)  

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67jovi ich habe noch einen anderen Beitrag gefunden,

 
  
    #214
23.10.03 10:59
bis ich das andere (vielleicht) ins Kölsch översetzt han.*g*

SEC Gets Religion, Supports End to Naked Short Selling

Oct 23, 2003 (financialwire.net via COMTEX) -- (FinancialWire) The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission let the world know Wednesday that its Commissioners have religion, even if the staff may yet have been fully converted.

New Regulation SHO, if adopted, nevertheless will put a big damper on "naked short selling" as one form of manipulative trading that has directly impacted at least 119 public companies, including at minimum 13 market makers and brokers, including A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), E*Trade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), and Knight Securities, LP (NASDAQ: NITE).

The practice is already illegal, but the SEC is trying to put some teeth into its rules.

During discussions about the proposed new rule, which would make it illegal for anyone to sell a company's shares short without having first finding stock that can be delivered within two days, the Commissioners sharply disagreed with the staff that the accompanying new "rising bid" rule could not be applied equally to over-the-counter stocks.

The staff was insistent that OTC and OTCBB stocks do not have reliable consolidated prices, but the Commissioners, including Chairman William Donaldson, implored the staff to try harder, and suggested that public commentators "may help us find a solution."

The proposed rule states that if a broker or an investor fails to deliver within two days after the settlement date, the account of that firm or individual will effectively be unable to short sell that stock for 90 days.

Critics already disagree with that, believing that it should be the brokers and dealers who "assist" the short selling process who should be banned from short selling if their firm is in violation.

Since the proposed rule will effect short selling outside the U.S. as well as within the borders, the biggest campground for manipulative traders, Canada, would be sharply curtailed.

Staff said that in 1999 when short selling was last examined, the SEC got over 2,000 comments. The upcoming 60-day comment period could see that record broken.

FinancialWire has been covering the issue for the past 12 months. Only recently has the issue gained the attention of other national media.

The proposed rule has to be published in the Federal Register, and may not be posted for comment before approximately two weeks.

 

8970 Postings, 7732 Tage bammieyooo na das sieht doch schon viel besser aus

 
  
    #215
23.10.03 11:29
das was die besprochen haben konnte man sehr schön in den letzten Tagen beoabchten.

dieses naked short selling macht nur alles kaputt :/ also wech damit :)

 

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67Wird aber mindestens noch 2 Wochen dauern,da

 
  
    #216
23.10.03 11:39
"The proposed rule has to be published in the Federal Register, and may not be posted for comment before approximately two weeks."

Wie sich das kurzfristig auswirkt weiß ich nicht.
Vielleicht shorten die jetzt erst recht wie bekloppt,da das erst in 14 Tagen amtlich wird.
Gibt es Meinungen dazu?

 

1433 Postings, 7872 Tage joviMeinung?

 
  
    #217
23.10.03 11:43
Klar..meine..
schätze die nächsten 2 Wochen werden noch heftig also entweder nachkaufen oder zurücklehnen und PC erst in 2 Wochen wieder einschalten.
Ich persönlich bin für nachkaufen  :)  

8970 Postings, 7732 Tage bammieyo Änderungen werden nicht von

 
  
    #218
23.10.03 11:43
heut auf morgen wirksam.. klar das das dauert...

aber wenigstens hat man jetzt die Gewissheit das das bald ne Rakete wird  

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67Hey Jungs und noch ne Einschätzung *g*

 
  
    #219
23.10.03 11:53
Composite Indicator
Trend Spotter (TM) Buy

Short Term Indicators
7 Day Average Directional Indicator Buy
10 - 8 Day Moving Average Hilo Channel Hold
20 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy
20 - 50 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
20 Day Bollinger Bands Hold

Short Term Indicators Average: 60% - Buy
20-Day Average Volume - 26852859

Medium Term Indicators
40 Day Commodity Channel Index Buy
50 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy
20 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy
50 Day Parabolic Time/Price Buy

Medium Term Indicators Average: 100% - Buy
50-Day Average Volume - 14675640

Long Term Indicators
60 Day Commodity Channel Index Buy
100 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy
50 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Hold

Long Term Indicators Average: 67% - Buy
100-Day Average Volume - 17384963

Overall Average: 80% - Buy

Price Support Pivot Point Resistance

0.09 0.08 0.09 0.11
 

20687 Postings, 9127 Tage preisfuchsjoker67 das sagt bei otc nichts aus!

 
  
    #220
23.10.03 12:08
das zeug kannst du verwenden wenn es um werte geht die an der nas geliste sind  

1433 Postings, 7872 Tage joviMist...

 
  
    #221
23.10.03 12:09
grad heut muß ich um 14.00 Uhr weg.
Haltet die Stellung...cu tomorrow :)

Gruß
Jovi

goooUSXPgooooUSXP  

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67@preisfuchs ist abgekupfert aus einem amiboard,

 
  
    #222
23.10.03 12:43
aber was Tatsache ist, ist der rt aus ffm

WKN  Börse Frankfurt  

WKN Börse Kurs Trade Vol. Tages Vol. Zeit Datum Bid Bid Vol. Ask Ask Vol. T.hoch T.tief Vortag Diff. Änd. Realtime
920232  FRA  0,086  20.000  130.025  12:33  23.10.  0,075  0  0,085  0  0,086  0,075  0,075  0,01  +14,67%

und der zieht langsam an.  

1433 Postings, 7872 Tage joviwisst ihr was richtig Spaß macht?

 
  
    #223
23.10.03 12:47
Bei RagingBull diese Nase xx cable zu ärgern, Mann kann der böse werden...
so, jetzt muß ich aber los, schönen Tag noch!
Jovi  

45711 Postings, 7818 Tage joker67NEWS

 
  
    #224
23.10.03 16:01
NEWS!!!!!!!!! Reduced Airline Fares Expected: Universal Express -USXP CEO Richard Altomare Recommends Nationwide Luggage Movement System Based On Parcel Carrier Model
Business Wire - October 23, 2003 09:56
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 23, 2003--Universal Express, Inc. (OTCBB:USXP) CEO Richard Altomare expects reduced airfares when airlines model the parcel carriers' system of moving packages. Altomare made specific recommendations about a nationwide luggage movement system in his Transportation Security White Paper "More Security, Less Hassle for American Travelers: A Private Sector Solution for the Airline Industry" which was disseminated this week on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C. The White Paper addresses the costs associated with transporting baggage. When incorporated by the airlines, he anticipates his plan could result in lower ticket prices.

Richard Altomare states, "I am proposing a security fee for passengers and a security fee for their baggage. This involves separating baggage from the passengers and encouraging travelers to ship their bags prior to the departure date. The luggage would be transported in a similar manner as the 5 billion parcels shipped annually by businesses and consumers utilizing parcel carriers. Passengers still have the option to carry bags to the airport but will pay a higher separate charge per piece plus a per baggage security fee for the screening service by the TSA and airport authorities. But, the passenger can choose how to handle his own baggage. My plan further enables the airlines to save between $1.6 billion and $4 billion in labor costs due to the diminished need for baggage handlers, damage claims and lost baggage, as well as generating in excess of 250,000 private sector jobs. There will be no reason for airlines to continue to charge additional fees to a traveler that cooperates with the new baggage system. This should result in lower ticket costs. This proposal is further addressed in Tuesday's Congressional Quarterly. We are pleased that our plan is being discussed on Capitol Hill and has drawn the attention of the Capitol Hill media."

Satish Jindel, a transportation industry expert and Principal at SJ Consulting Group in Pittsburgh notes, "In order to be financially healthy, airlines should establish a separate charge for transporting bags by unbundling the current airfare for passengers. According to the proposal spelled out in Mr. Altomare's White Paper, parcel carriers offer a model for the airlines, which can be used to restructure airline fares. In the last 15 years, the leading parcel carriers have unbundled their parcel rates. By imposing special charges from 8%-35%, the parcel carrier rates reflected the differences in the customers' needs and the subsequent cost of services. Thus according to the White Paper, with the implementation of a separate baggage transportation charge for check-in and carry-on by airlines and a separate baggage security screening fee by the TSA; a passenger with one small bag will pay less for the total trip than a passenger with two check-ins and one carry-on. These charges will create incentive for passengers to travel with fewer and smaller bags. The result will be enhanced security, and faster movement of passengers in and out of the airport. I applaud the recommendations proposed in this White Paper. Incorporating a separate charge for bags will generate several billion dollars in new revenue for the airlines and should result in lower fares for passengers that travel light."

For a copy of the White Paper contact:

Mr. Ron Garner, Equitilink, 877-788-1940

Universal Express, Inc. owns and operates several subsidiaries including Universal Express Capital Corp. (USXP Cash Express division), Universal Express Logistics, Inc. (The Virtual Bellhop, LLC and Luggage Express) and the WorldPost(TM) Private Postal Network, Inc. These subsidiaries and divisions provide the private postal industry and customers with value-added services and products, logistical services, equipment leasing, and cost-effective delivery of goods worldwide.

More information and website locations are available at www.usxp.com.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements contained herein, which are not historical, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, certain delays beyond the Company's control with respect to market acceptance of new technologies or products delays in testing and evaluation of products, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


CONTACT: Equitilink
Ron Garner, 877-788-1940

 

2676 Postings, 7770 Tage sam76drüben geht es nach oben!! o. T.

 
  
    #225
23.10.03 16:12

Seite: < 1 | ... | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | ... 80  >  
   Antwort einfügen - nach oben