+Seaddrill mit Potenzial+
Seite 48 von 77 Neuester Beitrag: 13.06.22 07:54 | ||||
Eröffnet am: | 12.05.08 12:15 | von: Börsenfreak8. | Anzahl Beiträge: | 2.911 |
Neuester Beitrag: | 13.06.22 07:54 | von: Juglans | Leser gesamt: | 636.645 |
Forum: | Hot-Stocks | Leser heute: | 25 | |
Bewertet mit: | ||||
Seite: < 1 | ... | 45 | 46 | 47 | | 49 | 50 | 51 | ... 77 > |
Gratulation auch an alle, die die schnellen 10 % mitgenommen haben; hier gilt die Devise: hast du Gewinn, schnell wieder raus...
Trotzdem: ich investiere hier keinen Cent; erst bei 10 Cent schlage ich zu, aber nur wenige Stücke und wegen Thrill....
Ich bleibe drin und warte auf den nächsten Short Squeeze bei Seadrill.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/07/...e-mother-of-all-short-squeezes.html
Seadrill: A Small But Nice Victory
Mar. 20, 2017 1:37 PM ET|
About: Seadrill Limited (SDRL)
Achilles Research
Achilles Research
Long/short equity, special situations
(17,072 followers)
Summary
Seadrill announced a settlement with Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries last week.
The settlement yields $170 million in cash for Seadrill related to the cancellation of the West Mira construction contract.
The settlement is a welcomed victory at a time of significant stress for the offshore drilling company.
I am not prepared to give up on Seadrill just yet. Billionaire investor and Seadrill shareholder Fredriksen may throw the struggling company a life line.
Offshore drilling contractor firm Seadrill Ltd. (NYSE:SDRL) reached a settlement with South Korean shipbuilder Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. last week that will lead to a cash infusion of $170 million this month, but will also force the company to take an impairment charge of $44 million related to the canceled construction contract for the West Mira.
Seadrill Ltd. so far has not informed shareholders that it has reached a mutually beneficial solution to its indebtedness problem with its creditors. The offshore drilling company, brought down to its knees by low crude oil prices and massive spending cuts in the offshore industry, has yet to work out a deal with lenders in order to reduce its leverage and transition to a more sustainable capital structure that would see the extension of existing debt maturities, covenant relief, as well as the infusion of new capital from existing or new investors.
However, Seadrill booked a victory on another front last week when the offshore drilling company said in a statement that it reached a settlement with Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., a shipbuilder that Seadrill contracted to build a new ultra-deepwater semi-submersible drilling rig in 2012, the West Mira, but ultimately exercised its right to terminate the construction contract as Hyundai failed to deliver the rig on time. Seadrill has now reached a settlement in an arbitration process, and is expected to receive $170 million in cash in March 2017. At the same time Seadrill will have to swallow a $44 million impairment loss (which is purely an accounting entry), reflecting the difference between the West Mira receivable value and the cash settlement.
The settlement leads to a nice cash infusion at a time when Seadrill continues to try to hammer out a deal with its lenders. As small as this victory may be, it is an important victory for a company that fights for its survival.
A Life Line From Billionaire Investor Fredriksen?
Fredriksen's asset holding company Seatankers purchased the West Mira semi-submersible rig for $365 million which was part of the settlement agreement between Seadrill and Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. Fredriksen is an enterprising business owner with a contrarian mindset and a good sense for investments that are out of favor. As a result, I wouldn't be at all surprised if Fredriksen provided some sort of bridge financing/loan/additional capital himself to help Seadrill out. The fact that Seatankers buys rigs at this stage of the growth cycle suggests that the billionaire shareholder has not given up on Seadrill and his offshore drilling business just yet either.
Your Takeaway
There is no question: Seadrill stands with its back to the wall and the company has so far not given investors an update as to where negotiations with its creditors stand. In other words: The company is likely deeply involved in negotiations at this time but they haven't yielded any meaningful results yet. However, I think Fredriksen has a long term view on the offshore drilling industry, and the purchase of the West Mira by Seatankers attests to just that. As far as I am concerned, Fredriksen may be a lender of last resort for Seadrill. It's not yet the time to throw in the towel.
If you like to read more of my articles, and like to be kept up to date with the companies I cover, I kindly ask you that you scroll to the top of this page and click 'follow'. I am largely investing in dividend paying stocks, but also venture out occasionally and cover special situations that offer appealing reward-to-risk ratios and have potential for significant capital appreciation. Above all, my immediate investment goal is to achieve financial independence.
Disclosure: I am/we are long SDRL.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/07/...e-mother-of-all-short-squeezes.html
und der short squeeze hat längst stattgefunden!
Im Artikel in #1182 ist für mich folgender Absatz relevant:
"The company is likely deeply involved in negotiations at this time but they haven't yielded any meaningful results yet."
Kommentar: Seadrill ist und bleibt m.M.n. eine Wette auf 100 % oder Totalverlust droht.
Viel Glück
Immerhin sprechen wir hier von rund 5-10 börsengelisteten Unternehmen, die allesamt extern von Seadrill arbeiten.
Welche AG warnt schon vor Totalverlust? Chapeau Seadrill...
Sorry für diejenigen, die auf erfolgreiche Restrukturierungsgespräche gesetzt haben!
Vielleicht will man damit lediglich seine Verhandlungsposition verbessern, indem man den Börsenwert bewusst abstürzen lässt.
Wäre in so einem Fall ein debt/equity swap weniger lukrativ für die Bankenwelt. da ja die equities weniger wert wären?
Es scheint mir unlogisch, warum man mit den Banken erst eine Verlängerung der Kreditlinie aushandelt, um dann direkt zu sagen, dass man danach Chapter 11 ankündigt?
Dann kann man es doch direkt machen, alles andere wäre doch lediglich Insolvenzverschleppung.
Machen diese Gedanken Sinn?
Lese mal was du vor ein paar tagen geschrieben hast... hier darf man nicht träumen... sogar der aktuelle Kurs ist zu hoch, bei den bestehenden Risiken... meine Empfehlung, Finger weg von der Aktie! Die ist zu teuer... ich kaufe mal wieder max.10t Stück, bei Kursen <0,5€ ... und das auch nur für eine kurze Zeit
Das Ganze erscheint mit als Vabanque-Spiel zwischen Seadrill und den Geldgebern. Wenn die Geldgeber bei einer Insolvenz nicht den größten Teil ihrer Darlehen in den Kamin schreiben wollen, müssen Mittel und Wege gefunden werden, dass Seadrill wirtschaftlich arbeiten und Gewinne erzielen kann. So einfach ist das eigentlich. Nur wenn Seadrill weiter arbeiten kann, haben alle Beteiligten überhaupt eine Chance, ihr gesamtes Geld wieder zu sehen. Fragt sich nur, wer der weiße Ritter sein will.
Read more at http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/...kocYMcYcDZCg1A.99
und auch wenn es mal einen weißen Ritter gibt, wird es noch lange dauern, bis man hier das eigene Geld sicher parken kann