Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LEH)

http://ih.advfn.com/...ctype=1&width=560&height=250&vol=1

aber ich glaube die haben noch nicht mal richtig angefangen.
Da kommt noch viel viel mehr !!!  

welche hab :-)  

Börse ist nicht rational wie Lehmann gerade beweisst, und ich bin echt happy dass ich heute morgen zu 0,023 nachgelegt habe, was beweist, nur wer wagt der auch gewinnt.

Good luck us all

 

 

die Lehman kommt meist allerdings erst kurz danach...  

WEnn du eine Frau bist?, welche über von dir beschriebene Fähigkeiten besitzt, dann hättest du mein Posting verstanden.

Aber ich denke du meintest mit 4 Dimensional deinen damit zugrundeliegenden Alkoholspiegel.

Intuition ist das eine, doch gibt es einfach auch Fakten - Faken - Fakten ( wer hat das nochmal gesagt??)

Ist ja alles wurscht. Jedenfalls wünsche ich dir und allen Anderen Pushern viele Millionen und einen vor Neid erblassten Tintifax.

Die Spannung hält zumindest länger, als beim Lotto oder jedem anderen Glückspiel.

Habe die Ehre.

 

 

 

nicht antworten !  

Ich weiß nicht, wer "Fakten faken" gesagt hat. Aber ich weiß, dass es Dir ein Bedürfnis ist, Fakten zu faken. Die Frage nach Deiner Motivation bleibt dabei ein großes Geheimnis.  

Form 8-K for LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC

28-Oct-2011

Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits


ITEM 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.

As previously disclosed, on September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings  Inc. (the "Registrant") filed a voluntary petition for relief under  chapter 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the  United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York  (the "Court") in a jointly administered case named In re Lehman Brothers  Holdings Inc., et. al. under Case Number 08-13555 (the "Chapter 11  Case"). As further disclosed previously, certain of the Registrant's  subsidiaries (collectively with the Registrant, the "Debtors") have also  each filed a case under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors'  chapter 11 cases have been consolidated for procedural purposes only  and are being jointly administered pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the  Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Debtors continue to  operate as debtors-in-possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108  of the Bankruptcy Code.

On September 1, 2011, the Debtors filed with the Court their third  amended chapter 11 plan (the "Third Amended Plan") and a disclosure  statement for the Third Amended Plan (the "Disclosure Statement").

On September 1, 2011, the Court entered an order (the "Disclosure  Statement Order") approving the Disclosure Statement as containing  adequate information of a kind and in sufficient detail to enable a  hypothetical creditor to make an informed judgment whether to accept or  reject the Third Amended Plan. Pursuant to the Disclosure Statement  Order, the Debtors were authorized to begin solicitation of acceptances  of the Third Amended Plan in accordance with section 1125 of the  Bankruptcy Code.

On October 25, 2011, the Debtors filed with the Court a supplement (the  "Plan Supplement") to the Third Amended Plan. The Plan Supplement  includes various documents related to the Third Amended Plan and  referenced therein. The discussion of the Plan Supplement herein is a  summary and is qualified in its entirety by the Plan Supplement attached  as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by  reference herein.

The Plan Supplement includes, among other things, (i) forms of revised  certificates of incorporation and by-laws for certain Debtors pursuant  to
Section 7.7 of the Third Amended Plan; (ii) schedules of executory  contracts and unexpired leases to be assumed by Debtors pursuant to  Section 11.1 of the Third Amended Plan; (iii) a plan trust agreement;  (iv) a form of Debtor allocation agreement; (v) copies of settlement  agreements among Debtors and non-controlled affiliates pursuant to  Section 6.5(b)(vi) of the Third Amended Plan; (vi) copies of settlement  agreements among Debtors and other creditors pursuant to
Section 6.5(j) of the Third Amended Plan; (vii) an amendment to the  Third Amended Plan; (viii) updated recovery analyses for Structured  Assets Securities Corporation and Lehman Brothers Commercial  Corporation; (ix) a schedule of claims by Debtor-controlled entities;  (x) reconciliation of the ownership and rights of various Debtors and  affiliates with respect to certain assets; and
(xi) list of Debtors and Debtor-controlled entities to be dissolved or  merged pursuant to the Third Amended Plan. All information contained in  the Plan Supplement is subject to change, and the Debtors reserve the  right to alter, amend, update, supplement, or modify the Plan  Supplement.

Limitation on Incorporation by Reference

In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information  in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed "filed"  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the  "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that  section, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference  in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as  shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Current Report on Form 8-K, Exhibit 99.1 hereto may contain  forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities  Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the Registrant's financial  condition, results of operations, and business that is not historical  information. As a general matter, forward-looking statements are those  focused upon future or anticipated events or trends and expectations and  beliefs relating to matters that are not historical in nature. The  words "believe," "expect," "plan," "intend," "estimate," or "anticipate"  and similar expressions, as well as future or conditional verbs such as  "will," "should," "would," and "could," often identify forward-looking  statements. The Registrant believes there is a reasonable basis for its  expectations and beliefs, but they are inherently uncertain, and the  Registrant may not realize its expectations and its beliefs may not  prove correct. The Registrant undertakes no obligation to publicly  update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of  new information, future events, or otherwise. The Registrant's actual  results and future financial condition may differ materially from those  described or implied by any such forward-looking statements as a result  of many factors that may be outside the Registrant's control. Such  factors include, without limitation: (i) the ability of the Registrant  to develop, prosecute, confirm, and consummate any plan of  reorganization or liquidation with respect to the Chapter 11 Case; (ii)  the Registrant's ability to obtain Court approval with respect to  motions in the Chapter 11 Case; (iii) risks associated with third  parties seeking and obtaining court approval for the appointment of a  Chapter 11 trustee; and (iv) the potential adverse impact of the Chapter  11 Case on the Registrant's liquidity or results of operations. This  list is not intended to be exhaustive.

The Registrant's informational filings with the Court are available to  the public at the office of the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court, Alexander  Hamilton Custom House, One Bowling Green, New York, New York  10004-1408. Such informational filings may be available electronically,  for a fee, through the Court's Internet world wide web site  (www.nysb.uscourts.gov), and/or free of cost, at a world wide web site  maintained by the Registrant's Court-approved noticing agent  (www.lehman-docket.com).



ITEM 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d) Exhibit

99.1 Plan Supplement to the Debtors' Third Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, dated September 1, 2011.

 

27.10.2011 | 21:28
Lehman Brothers Completes Innkeepers Transaction; Receives Payout of $224 Million:

"LEHMAN Brothers Holdings Inc. announced today that the transaction has been completed through which its affiliate, Lehman ALI Inc., received a $224 million payout as a secured creditor in connection with the sale of assets of INNKEEPERS USA Trust and its affiliates to CERBERUS Series Four Holdings, LLC, CHATHAM Lodging Trust and other related parties. This transaction, which was approved by the bankruptcy court on October 21, 2011, is part of the sale of 64 Innkeepers hotels to the Cerberus and Chatham joint venture for more than $1 billion that enables Innkeepers to complete its emergence from bankruptcy.

Jeff Fitts, a managing director at professional services firm Alvarez & Marsal who heads Lehman's real estate group, said: "This transaction delivers significant value to the Lehman estate, is a significant improvement on the original "stalking horse" proposal and ends any further litigation delay. We have been and remain committed to achieving the best value for each of Lehman's assets as the Lehman estate moves toward confirmation of its plan."

Michael Lascher, a managing director in Lehman's real estate group, added: "Our debt position in Innkeepers has been one of the more complex and challenging assets to resolve for the Lehman estate. It is an example of the Estate's ability to achieve successful outcomes in the face of unexpected hurdles. We are pleased to have concluded it in a way that maximizes its value for our creditors."

Lehman ALI was advised by Dechert LLP and Lazard Frères & Co. LLC.
Full details on the transaction can be found at  www.omnimgt.com/innkeepers  ".

SOURCE / LINK / QUELLE  dieser Nachricht:
http://www.finanznachrichten.de/...yout-of-dollar-224-million-004.htm

Weiß nicht, warum du hier überhaupt reinschaust und noch weniger verstehe ich, warum du noch immer deine Meinung kund tun musst.

Wir kennen diese und es interessiert hier keinen! Jeder von uns ist sich im darüber im Klaren, dass es zu einem Totalverlust führen kann, es ist einkalkuliert. Jeder von uns ist über 18 und brauchen dich somit nicht mehr als Mutti! Jeder von uns trifft seine eigenen Entscheidungen.

Wenn du irgendwie gefrustet sein solltest, dann kann ich dir gerne Hilfe anbieten, meine Freundin ist Psychologin.

Allen anderen wünsche ich ein schönes, vorfreudiges Wochenende!

 

@ SM Monika

@ Teras

Bitte nicht auf die deutsche Übersetzung für DeppSee vergessen.

Sagt ihm auch gleich noch, ob er kaufen oder verkaufen soll.

SM Monika: deine Antworten sind leider nutzlos und daher muß ich DeppSee wirklich Recht geben wenn er schreibt:

Antwortet dem blos nicht.

@ DeppSee: hast du schon mal überlegt, daß ich eigentlich jeder hier sein könnte?

Es grüßt der liebe Tintifax

 

Wenn ich mir die Historie anschaue,
erwarte ich die nächsten Handelstage eine kleine Stagnation, so um die 4 Cent, bis es nochmals ordentlich ruckelt, wobei die letzen beiden Tage die Umsätze schon ganz ordentlich waren - gekoppelt (eventuell auch nur zufällig) an eine Starke Entwicklung im DJ.
Mal schauen, ob wir im Lauf der kommenden Woche die 6 Cent schaffen - es ist wirklich sehr spannend.  

http://ih.advfn.com/...ctype=1&width=560&height=250&vol=1

Oct 29, 2011 3:12 PM GMT+0200
Barclays, Lehman Brokerage Resume $3 Billion Asset Fight
By Linda SANDLER:

"A U.S. bankruptcy judge’s order that BARCLAYS Plc return $2 billion in margin assets to the liquidator of LEHMAN Brothers Holdings Inc.’s brokerage was “commercially absurd” and should be reversed, the U.K. bank said in a court filing challenging the decision.

“Courts should avoid interpretations that are commercially absurd and make no economic sense,” BARCLAYS argued in the appeal yesterday in Manhattan federal court, saying that the ruling violated established law.

The LEHMAN brokerage’s trustee yesterday disputed a separate ruling by the same judge, claiming he ERRED in awarding $1.1 billion in assets to Barclays. The judge MISTAKENLY focused on a description of the assets, held in boxes to clear trades, rather than concentrating on which party they were owed to, the trustee argued in his own appeal.

The dueling filings between London-based BARCLAYS and trustee James GIDDENS follow a bankruptcy court trial held in 2010 before U.S. Bankruptcy Judge James PECK in Manhattan. BOTH sides have challenged PECK’s June order on the fight over assets"...

SOURCE / LINK / QUELLE  dieses Ausschnitts:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-29/...barclays-1-1-billion.html

Damit wird die Insolvenszeit mit 'Sicherheit zunächst verlängert, ob nun andere Assets am Wert gewinnen oder andere Ursache irgendwelche Hypes auslösen - die Frist dafür wird verlängert.
Die kommenden beiden Woche sind nicht unspannend.  

Auch die Deutsche Bank VERZÖGERT derzeit das Chapter-11-Verfahren und VERLÄNGERT dadurch die Insolvenz-Zeit, wenn auch aus anderen Gründen als die BARCLAYS Plc. und der U.S. Trustee...

Die Deutsche Bank will nämlich ihre über mehrere JAHRE gegen die LEHMAN Brothers zusammengekauften Forderungen als "General UNSECURED Claims" (Generell UNGESICHERTE Forderungen) eingestuft sehen, welches auf den ersten Blick unsinnige Ansinnen sehr WOHL einen Sinn macht, wenn nämlich in der Zwischen-Zeit (was wir 'mal prüfen müssten!) andere "Forderungen" gegen die LEHMAN Brothers ABGEWIESEN wurden, wodurch die Auszahlung auf die UNSECUREDs selbst-redend STEIGT:

Docket #21416, 10/28/2011: Objection to Motion Objection to Confirmation of Plan as to LBHI and LCPI to the Extent it Fails to Properly Classify and Treat Deutsche Bank AG Claims and Renewed Motion to Treat Such Claims Like and Equal to General Unsecured Claims Against LBHI and LPCI as Required by Court Approved Settlement filed by Alan Kolod on behalf of Deutsche Bank AG. (Kolod, Alan).
Case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.  
Related: none.

Und zum DOCUMENT dieses Docket's geht es dann HIER:
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/LBH/document/...x?DocumentId=1441026

Hierbei beruft sich die Deutsche Bank darauf, dass es bereits ein Settlement geben habe, welches vorsehe, dass ihre "Claims are not subject to any claims" (ihre Claims also keinen anderen Claims unterworfen werden), was in ihren Augen den Effect haben würde, sie anderen "general UNSECURED Claims" UNTERZUORDNEN (effect of SUBORDINATING them to other general unsecured claims):

"18. The Settlement provides that the Claims are not subject to any claims that would
have the effect of subordinating them to other general unsecured claims. (Settlement Agreement, ¶ 12(k); Settlement Order, Eighth Decretal Paragraph)".

Deshalb besteht die Deutsche Bank darauf, mit ihren wie auch immer erworbenen Forderungen "EQUAL" (gleiche) "treatment and distribution" (Behandlung und Verteilung) aus der Masse zu erhalten wie "other general unsecured claims against LBHI and LCPI" (andere generell UNGESICHERTE Forderungen gegen LEHMAN Brothers Holdings Inc. und LCPI):

"19. The Settlement provides that the Claims shall be “treated in a like manner” to
other general unsecured claims and shall “receive treatment and distribution . . . EQUAL to that of other general unsecured claims against LBHI and LCPI”. (These obligations of the Debtors are hereinafter sometimes referred to as “like and equal treatment.”) (Settlement Agreement, ¶ 12(k); Settlement Order, Eighth Decretal Paragraph)".

QUELLE zum Ganzen:
http://chapter11.epiqsystems.com/LBH/document/...x?DocumentId=1441026

vielleicht findet man hier ja rein zufällig auch mal 55 Mrd wie bei der HRE. So ein kleiner Buchungsfehler würde uns gut ins Konzept passen!  

Wo mit großen Zahlen gespielt wird, ist alles möglich. Insbesondere dann, wenn man sich absichtlich arm rechnen möchte.  

Die Insolvenzanmeldung von MF Global drückt wohl jetzt den Kurs.
http://www.ariva.de/news/...chuldenkrise-fordert-erstes-Opfer-3881016  

Lehman, Goldman settle tiff over real estate deal
Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:57pm EDT

* Goldman to buy 10-building portfolio in Rosslyn, Va.
* Settles lawsuit after Goldman previously canceled deal

By Nick Brown

Oct 31 (Reuters) - A nonbankrupt unit of Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc has closed on a deal to sell its
interest in a 10-office real estate portfolio to a Goldman
Sachs Group Inc unit, ending litigation after Goldman
initially canceled the deal.
Lehman's Rosslyn LB Syndication Partner LLC unit said in a
statement on Monday that the deal with Goldman's Usreo/Rosslyn
Investors LLC was official.
Separately, Lehman filed court papers on Monday announcing
it had settled a lawsuit accusing Goldman of using pretextual
excuses to avoid closing on the deal earlier in October.
Neither the court papers nor Lehman's statement revealed
how the settlement was reached or whether the purchase price
changed after Goldman reneged. The initial deal had been
expected to bring in at least $385 million to the Lehman
estate.
"This transaction is another example of our executing the
sale strategy we laid out at the beginning of the year and has
enabled us to achieve a strong result for our creditors," Jeff
Fitts, who heads Lehman's real estate group, said in the
statement.
A spokesman for Lehman declined to comment on specifics of
the deal, including purchase price. An attorney for Goldman
could not immediately be reached.
Lehman has said in court papers that the
3-million-square-foot office portfolio, located in Rosslyn,
Virginia, is valued at nearly $1.26 billion.
According to Lehman's lawsuit, Goldman canceled the
purchase two days before its closing date, saying Lehman had
failed to disclose certain leasing agreements and had submitted
tenant documents that were inconsistent with terms of the
deal.
Lehman rejected those grounds as "pretextual," saying
Goldman was looking for an excuse to "avoid its contractual
obligations."
Lehman is in the process of offloading its real estate
assets to pay back its creditors. Real estate sales are
expected to bring in $13.2 billion by the end of 2014,
according to other Lehman court filings.
The case is Rosslyn LB Syndication Partner LLC v.
Usreo/Rosslyn Investors LLC, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern
District of New York, No. 11-2764.
The Lehman bankruptcy is In re Lehman Brothers Holdings
Inc, in the same court, No. 08-13555.


http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSN1E79U20C20111101?irpc=932